Home » Commentary » Promises, Promises…
Our mission
Free Government Information (FGI) is a place for initiating dialogue and building consensus among the various players (libraries, government agencies, non-profit organizations, researchers, journalists, etc.) who have a stake in the preservation of and perpetual free access to government information. FGI promotes free government information through collaboration, education, advocacy and research.
Latest Posts
- PEGI Project Urges Preservation of Public Federal Data
- Public letter re the firing of the Archivist of the United States
- Call to arms: What government information librarians can do to help save critical federal information from being lost
- The government information crisis is bigger than you think it is
- Federal information scrubbing has begun. Please support the End of Term Archive and Environmental Data Governance Initiative (EDGI)
Latest Comments
- Aimee Quinn on The government information crisis is bigger than you think it is
- James R. Jacobs on Federal information scrubbing has begun. Please support the End of Term Archive and Environmental Data Governance Initiative (EDGI)
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- Kathleen Cunningham on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- Gretchen Gehrke on EDGI’s new public comments initiative
- James R. Jacobs on Reference question and the saga of chasing down a Congressionally mandated report
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- Cass Hartnett on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- James R. Jacobs on Beautiful video on the history of fire lookouts – and fire! – highlights lots of US govt publications and records
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
Blogroll
- ASU Gov Docs
- beSpacific
- Best. Titles. Ever. (Tumblr)
- Center for Effective Government
- Every CRS Report New Reports RSS Feed
- FDLP Desktop
- FDLP News & Events
- FullTextReports
- GISIG UW-SLIS: Gov Info, Sources, Data & Docs
- Government Book Talk
- Government Information Network (Canada)
- Government Information News from Fondren Library, Rice University
- GPO [twitter]
- INFOdocket
- Information Observatory
- Libraries+ Network
- Library Babel Fish by Barbara Fister
- NARA records express
- Open The Government
- Secrecy News
- SLA GovInfo [twitter]
- StatFountain
- Sunlight Foundation
- University of Washington Gov Pubs Finds
Promises, Promises…
Following up on yesterday’s post about Another Google Search going away:
Gary Price notes that Google had promised an archive of Twitter posts and that Google has recently removed another service:
I find it significant when for-profit companies develop products and then take them offline or when they fail to deliver on promised products. I don’t begrudge them the right to do this and I’m not surprised when they do. I find it significant, though, when libraries rely heavily on such services, particularly when they replace services and collections that libraries have traditionally provided to their user communities. Libraries always rely on commercial products, of course, from the old print volumes of Readers’ Guide to fancy online abstracting and indexing services. But there is a difference between using such products to supplement and enhance services and collections and using them to replace services and collections. When libraries decrease their own services and minimize their own locally-controlled collections and act as little more than a gateway to commercial services, they do their user communities no favors.
There is a lot being written about the role of libraries in the digital age and a lot of libraries are seemingly content to “let someone else do it.” When libraries give up to publishers and for-profit companies the traditional library roles of selecting, acquiring, organizing, providing access to and services for information, and (libraries hope) preserving that information, they are abrogating their essential role, their defining characteristics. Such decisions will surely weaken libraries as an institution. But what about their user-communities? Such decisions leave the communities at the mercy of private companies and the marketplace and without a say in what information is important to them.
IBM, a big company that has had its ups and downs, pointed out recently:
This isn’t surprising. What is profitable comes and goes. What is important for a user community shouldn’t be left to the whims of the marketplace; it should be in control of the community through its own institutions. When we consider the information that is important to a user community, that institution is, by definition, the library. Then promises can be made by — and kept by — the community itself.
Related
Tags: dot-coms, future of the library