Home » Posts tagged 'future of the library'
Tag Archives: future of the library
The Future of the Library
A few days ago I posted (The opportunities that libraries missed) a link to Peter Murray-Rust’s blog where he is discussing the future of the library and getting ideas for his talk at JISC’s Libraries of the Future Debate at the Bodleian April 2nd 2009.
The whole series of his posts (starting with librarians of the future – part I) and the comments he received from readers are definitely worth reading.
The opportunities that libraries missed
Peter Murray-Rust, of the Unilever Centre for Molecular Informatics, Cambridge, looks at the opportunities that libraries missed. This is a must-read.
He says that Libraries once had a central role in guiding scholarship but that neither Libraries nor Librarians do anymore. He traces this decline to “two major missed opportunities where, if we had had real guaradians of scholarship we would not be in the current mess – running scared of publishers and lawyers.”
- The library of the future – Guardian of Scholarship?, by Peter Murray Rust, petermr’s blog, March 19th, 2009.
So, simply, the librarian of the future must be a revolutionary. They may or may not be Librarians. If Librarians are not revolutionaries they have little future.
Wont’ Get Fooled Again: Day 31
An interesting editorial item from the New York Review of Books by Robert Darnton, Carl H. Pforzheimer University Professor at Harvard He has actually been tilling these intellectual fields for awhile for NYRB — here is a list of submissions. Goes without saying that I disagree with some of his observations. But with more than 100 days left on the current time clock, I will address those concerns another time….
See you on Day 32.
the really modern library
The folks at the The Institute For The Future Of The Book and the Digital Library Federation are having a series of brainstorming meetings to discuss what they call "the really modern library." Read more at the Institute’s blog:
- the really modern library the institute for the future of the book, October 8, 2007.
The goal of this project is to shed light on the big questions about future accessibility and usability of analog culture in a digital, networked world.
July 5, 2011 / 1 Comment on Promises, Promises…
Following up on yesterday’s post about Another Google Search going away:
Gary Price notes that Google had promised an archive of Twitter posts and that Google has recently removed another service:
I find it significant when for-profit companies develop products and then take them offline or when they fail to deliver on promised products. I don’t begrudge them the right to do this and I’m not surprised when they do. I find it significant, though, when libraries rely heavily on such services, particularly when they replace services and collections that libraries have traditionally provided to their user communities. Libraries always rely on commercial products, of course, from the old print volumes of Readers’ Guide to fancy online abstracting and indexing services. But there is a difference between using such products to supplement and enhance services and collections and using them to replace services and collections. When libraries decrease their own services and minimize their own locally-controlled collections and act as little more than a gateway to commercial services, they do their user communities no favors.
There is a lot being written about the role of libraries in the digital age and a lot of libraries are seemingly content to “let someone else do it.” When libraries give up to publishers and for-profit companies the traditional library roles of selecting, acquiring, organizing, providing access to and services for information, and (libraries hope) preserving that information, they are abrogating their essential role, their defining characteristics. Such decisions will surely weaken libraries as an institution. But what about their user-communities? Such decisions leave the communities at the mercy of private companies and the marketplace and without a say in what information is important to them.
IBM, a big company that has had its ups and downs, pointed out recently:
This isn’t surprising. What is profitable comes and goes. What is important for a user community shouldn’t be left to the whims of the marketplace; it should be in control of the community through its own institutions. When we consider the information that is important to a user community, that institution is, by definition, the library. Then promises can be made by — and kept by — the community itself.