Comment Submission to GPO and Depository Library Council
On November 26, 2006, the volunteers at Free Government Information passed along all comments received on our DLC Digital Distribution page to the people named below. For a PDF copy of our responses and your comments, please see the file attached to this page.
Dear Mr. James, Ms. Russell, Mr. Davis, Mr. Wash and members of the Depository Library Council: As you are well aware, the Depository Library Council held a session on Digital Distribution in Washington DC on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 as part of the Fall 2006 Depository Library Council meeting. In hopes of broadening the discussion on digital distribution beyond the confines of in-person Council meetings, I and the other volunteers at Free Government Information posted responses to the Digital Distribution discussion questions presented at Council on the FGI website (http://freegovinfo.info) and invited others to add their own comments. We are attaching to this email a copy of our comments and the responses from other librarians. We do not pretend to represent the whole depository community, just a few voices from people unable to travel to Council. We appreciate the fact that you are addressing this issue and reaching out to the depository community for their comments and ideas. Because this issue is so important and because so many depository librarians cannot attend Council meetings, we suggest that you reach out to the community even more and take input from a broader section of the community before major decisions are made. Some of the actions you might take include:Continue readingThank you for taking time to receive more input on an issue that will shape citizen access to federal government information for years to come.
- Using your OPAL meeting room to hold a set of “virtual town meetings†on the topic of digital distribution.
- Survey either the entire FDLP or the subset of libraries indicating willingness to take digital items on issues related to digital distribution.
- Send GPO/DLC reps to State library association meetings to given presentations on FDSys and take suggestions on Digital Distribution.
News of EPA library closures makes headlines
Alternet just posted a story about the closing of the EPA libraries ("A Step Shy of Book-Burning." By Kelpie Wilson, 11/23/06). This article, in addition to positive news stories over the last month or so has moved the plight of the EPA libraries into the mainstream and caused our Congress people to reevaluate the horrendously bad decision that has caused the closure of EPA libraries. But the fight's not over yet. Please, please, please contact your representatives and let them know you support the refunding of EPA libraries -- AND fill in ALA's legislative action. See the ALA Washington office for background information.
In August, under the guise of fiscal responsibility, the Bush Environmental Protection Agency began closing most of its research libraries, both to the public and to its own staff. The EPA's professional staff objected strongly, insisting that closing the libraries would hamstring them in their jobs. In a letter to Congress protesting the closures, public employees said, "We believe that this budget cut is just one of many Bush administration initiatives to reduce the effectiveness of the US Environmental Protection Agency, and to continue to demoralize its employees." [..]Closing the EPA libraries is the perfect symbol to characterize the methods of the Bush administration. Since 2000, the Republicans have cemented their reputation as ushers of a new dark age. They have sought to shroud the light of science by closing libraries and by suppressing scientific reports. They have gagged their own scientists and persecuted whistleblowers. They have cloaked government in secrecy, a prime example being Dick Cheney's secret meetings with oil companies to draft an industry-friendly national energy policy. But that era is now winding down.Continue reading
Public Libraries and US Code Index
Recently, there was a govdoc-l thread on the posibility of Congress discontinuing its printed index to the United States Code. At first this didn't seem to be such a big deal since my library also subscribes to the U.S.C.A, LEXIS and the code itself is freely available online.
Subject: Re: US Code Index may be eliminated I'm so glad you posed this question! I sometimes feel in the minority in the gov docs community because I'm at a public library, and your question brings up issues that are at the heart of serving our public! Our limited funds mean that Westlaw, Lexis, and other paid databases are not options, so yes, our patrons do use the index, and usually prefer using the print to the electronic option. They also use the appendices. Please let the good folks at the Office of Law Revision Counsel know that if they do not put the money into the print version, then PLEASE spend that money on more computers, more instructional classes for library staff and the public, and more database access in our public libraries! Access to our country's laws should not be dependent upon the economic class of the person requesting it! Melissa Earley Reference Librarian II, Government Documents & H. Carlisle Bean Law Library Spartanburg County Public LibrariesSince the vast majority of the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) libraries have historically been academic and special libraries, it is easy to overlook the needs of public libraries (20%) which as a group have fewer resources. Additionally, although public libraries are the smallest part of the FDLP, they are closest to the ordinary citizen that the FDLP is supposed to serve. So the federal government and the rest of the depostiory community have a responsibility to make it easier for public libraries to provide federal government information, not harder. If print is what is needed to help public libraries, the government should give it to them. Thanks Melissa for bringing this issue of public library needs to the community's attention. Continue reading
Smithsonian campaign and hacker tax credit
Here's a twofer to give you some more reading matter over the long weekend: A friend sent me this internet campaign to shed public light on the secret Smithsonian/Showtime contract that would give Showtime a 30 year, non-competitive stranglehold on Smithsonian (i.e. public domain!) archives. Background on the story can be found at boingboing. If you want to be added as a signatory, please send email to Carl Malamud (carl@media.org) no later than Sunday, November 25, 2006. After, I signed the letter, I was looking around the public.resource site and came across another campaign (perhaps dated but still viable!) that Carl had put together calling for a hacker tax credit! The basic idea is that open source software, because it is the driving force behind our new information culture, should be supported publically so that more growth can happen. Check out the text of the letter below that Malamud suggests you send to your Congresspeople. This campaign, as I said earlier, may be dated (he lists Vice President Al Gore as a suggested addressee), but open source software (sometimes called FLOSS) is still something for which we should all be advocating!
Pablo Picasso once said that good art is created, but great art is stolen. On the Internet, the same holds true. Good code is created, but great code is copied over and over.
The Internet was created from open source software, code that people can freely use to build new code, to run their networks, to create a new business, or to build a service that people can use.
Take for example the work of Paul Vixie, who has placed in the public domain the software that the Domain Name System runs on. This software has been used by every major Internet Service Provider and has been bundled into the operating system products of IBM, DEC, Silicon Graphics, and Sun.
Open source software created the Internet, and created the economic boom we now see in Silicon Valley. Most of the large web sites in the world run on the open source Apache web server. The $4 billion Netscape Corporation was built from the open source Mosaic. The PERL programming language was created as open source, but now fuels over $100 million in book sales for publishers like O'Reilly & Associates.
But, we are eating our seed corn. There is no systematic national effort to create open source software and it is increasingly difficult to keep this infrastructure alive. For every success story like Apache, there are dozens of projects that languish because of the lack of formal support for open source projects.
In the global village, open source software is not an alternative to commercial software, just as in our real cities public parks are not an alternative to our commercial districts. The parks make our cities thrive, and thriving cities are a good place to do business.
It is a happy accident that we have open source software, but there are simple steps that the federal government can take to provide even more fuel for the growth of our information economy. Here is a simple algorithm for a Hacker Tax Credit that could be added to the U.S. Code:
#/us/usc/irs
if {
You produce software that is in the public domain ;
} andif {
That software is used by at least 1000 people ;
} then {
You may deduct your development and operational costs from your gross income for tax purposes ; }
If the U.S. Congress could compile this simple subroutine into the U.S. Code, this simple step would have a greater effect than any cuts in capital gain taxes. I urge you to consider steps that the U.S. Congress can take to insure a strategic national reserve of open source software.
Sincerely,
Carl Malamud
media.org Continue reading Sunshine Week national audit
**Public announcement** It's never too early to start planning for Sunshine Week 2007 (March 11-17), the national initiative to open a dialogue about the importance of open government and freedom of information! The 2nd annual webcast conference will include the results of a nationwide information audit organized by the American Society of Newspaper Editors, Sunshine Week, the Coalition of Journalists for Open Government and the National Freedom of Information Coalition. But they need your help! The audit, which is set to be conducted in early January, 2007, will consist of requestors going to pre-selected government offices, asking for copies of a particular public document and then recording how well the agency responds. If you are interested in participating or would like additional information, please contact Debra Gersh Hernandez, Sunshine Week coordinator, at dghernandez@asne.org or (703) 807-2100 as soon as possible. If you are ready to begin the audit but need a local partner, please contact the national audit facilitator Judith Burrell at judith_burrell@cox.net or (703) 281-3836. Continue reading