Public Libraries and US Code Index
Recently, there was a govdoc-l thread on the posibility of Congress discontinuing its printed index to the United States Code. At first this didn't seem to be such a big deal since my library also subscribes to the U.S.C.A, LEXIS and the code itself is freely available online.
Subject: Re: US Code Index may be eliminated I'm so glad you posed this question! I sometimes feel in the minority in the gov docs community because I'm at a public library, and your question brings up issues that are at the heart of serving our public! Our limited funds mean that Westlaw, Lexis, and other paid databases are not options, so yes, our patrons do use the index, and usually prefer using the print to the electronic option. They also use the appendices. Please let the good folks at the Office of Law Revision Counsel know that if they do not put the money into the print version, then PLEASE spend that money on more computers, more instructional classes for library staff and the public, and more database access in our public libraries! Access to our country's laws should not be dependent upon the economic class of the person requesting it! Melissa Earley Reference Librarian II, Government Documents & H. Carlisle Bean Law Library Spartanburg County Public LibrariesSince the vast majority of the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) libraries have historically been academic and special libraries, it is easy to overlook the needs of public libraries (20%) which as a group have fewer resources. Additionally, although public libraries are the smallest part of the FDLP, they are closest to the ordinary citizen that the FDLP is supposed to serve. So the federal government and the rest of the depostiory community have a responsibility to make it easier for public libraries to provide federal government information, not harder. If print is what is needed to help public libraries, the government should give it to them. Thanks Melissa for bringing this issue of public library needs to the community's attention. Continue reading
Smithsonian campaign and hacker tax credit
Here's a twofer to give you some more reading matter over the long weekend: A friend sent me this internet campaign to shed public light on the secret Smithsonian/Showtime contract that would give Showtime a 30 year, non-competitive stranglehold on Smithsonian (i.e. public domain!) archives. Background on the story can be found at boingboing. If you want to be added as a signatory, please send email to Carl Malamud (carl@media.org) no later than Sunday, November 25, 2006. After, I signed the letter, I was looking around the public.resource site and came across another campaign (perhaps dated but still viable!) that Carl had put together calling for a hacker tax credit! The basic idea is that open source software, because it is the driving force behind our new information culture, should be supported publically so that more growth can happen. Check out the text of the letter below that Malamud suggests you send to your Congresspeople. This campaign, as I said earlier, may be dated (he lists Vice President Al Gore as a suggested addressee), but open source software (sometimes called FLOSS) is still something for which we should all be advocating!
Pablo Picasso once said that good art is created, but great art is stolen. On the Internet, the same holds true. Good code is created, but great code is copied over and over.
The Internet was created from open source software, code that people can freely use to build new code, to run their networks, to create a new business, or to build a service that people can use.
Take for example the work of Paul Vixie, who has placed in the public domain the software that the Domain Name System runs on. This software has been used by every major Internet Service Provider and has been bundled into the operating system products of IBM, DEC, Silicon Graphics, and Sun.
Open source software created the Internet, and created the economic boom we now see in Silicon Valley. Most of the large web sites in the world run on the open source Apache web server. The $4 billion Netscape Corporation was built from the open source Mosaic. The PERL programming language was created as open source, but now fuels over $100 million in book sales for publishers like O'Reilly & Associates.
But, we are eating our seed corn. There is no systematic national effort to create open source software and it is increasingly difficult to keep this infrastructure alive. For every success story like Apache, there are dozens of projects that languish because of the lack of formal support for open source projects.
In the global village, open source software is not an alternative to commercial software, just as in our real cities public parks are not an alternative to our commercial districts. The parks make our cities thrive, and thriving cities are a good place to do business.
It is a happy accident that we have open source software, but there are simple steps that the federal government can take to provide even more fuel for the growth of our information economy. Here is a simple algorithm for a Hacker Tax Credit that could be added to the U.S. Code:
#/us/usc/irs
if {
You produce software that is in the public domain ;
} andif {
That software is used by at least 1000 people ;
} then {
You may deduct your development and operational costs from your gross income for tax purposes ; }
If the U.S. Congress could compile this simple subroutine into the U.S. Code, this simple step would have a greater effect than any cuts in capital gain taxes. I urge you to consider steps that the U.S. Congress can take to insure a strategic national reserve of open source software.
Sincerely,
Carl Malamud
media.org Continue reading Sunshine Week national audit
**Public announcement** It's never too early to start planning for Sunshine Week 2007 (March 11-17), the national initiative to open a dialogue about the importance of open government and freedom of information! The 2nd annual webcast conference will include the results of a nationwide information audit organized by the American Society of Newspaper Editors, Sunshine Week, the Coalition of Journalists for Open Government and the National Freedom of Information Coalition. But they need your help! The audit, which is set to be conducted in early January, 2007, will consist of requestors going to pre-selected government offices, asking for copies of a particular public document and then recording how well the agency responds. If you are interested in participating or would like additional information, please contact Debra Gersh Hernandez, Sunshine Week coordinator, at dghernandez@asne.org or (703) 807-2100 as soon as possible. If you are ready to begin the audit but need a local partner, please contact the national audit facilitator Judith Burrell at judith_burrell@cox.net or (703) 281-3836. Continue reading
Caution on comparing ACS to Census 2000
While this won't be news to those who follow Census developments closely, it is a nice summary of some of the important deficiencies in the American Community Survey:
- 2005 American Community Survey by Roger Owen Green, NYS SBDC Research Network (November 21, 2006)
Writing for the New York State Small Business Development Center (NYS SBDC) Green notes that:
...because of previous cuts in the Congressional funding, the 2005 ACS does not capture data from group quarters, which include prisons, college dormitories, and nursing homes.
One thing this means is that in geographic areas where there is a large group quarters population, comparisons of figures from ACS to Census 2000 may be inaccurate or misleading. As Green says, "...politicians and the media have glommed onto these new statistics, making assertions about populations that the methodology does not support."
Continue readingMore on Google working with agencies
Here is another article about Google working with government agencies to get them to use Google SiteMaps to make their information more accessible:
- Google wants you, by Joab Jackson, GCN (November 20, 2006).
John Lewis Needham, development manager for Google, is quoted as saying that at least 20 percent of all government information is locked in databases that can only be accessed from web forms. He also cites a study that discovered that "70 percent of visitors to the National Institutes of Health were directed there by search engines, whereas only 4 percent of the visitors came directly to the site by simply typing in the Web address."
Continue reading