Fed shredding on the increase since 2000

Shredding contracts since 2000

And speaking of usaspending.gov (thanks Jim for the original post!),  Radar Magazine has analyzed federal spending on paper shredding contracts since 2000 (see chart at left) and shown that there has been a 600% increase on these contracts since George W. Bush took office. In 2000, the federal government spent $452,807 on shredding services (no doubt some appropriate and some not); by 2006, the "Cheney Effect" had bumped that number up to $2.9 million. And by halfway through 2007, the feds almost matched that number, with $2.7 million and counting. Here's the full breakdown and data from usaspending.gov.

Continue reading

Continue Reading →

New OMB Federal Spending Database

The Office of Management and Budget is launching USASpending.gov a relaunch of www.FederalSpending.gov to providecitizens with easy access to government contract, grant, and other award data.

News stories:

"The database’s initial functionality will include the ability to search contracts and grants but not other types of spending data such as loans, said Robert Shea, OMB’s associate director of administration and government performance." (FCW)

The database will have an API (application programmming interface) so that programmers will be able to users to write software to access the data directly, and a wiki where users will be able to suggest changes and add information.

Continue reading

Continue Reading →

ALA: public libraries critical to delivery of E-government

Yesterday, ALA submitted a statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing, "E-Government 2.0: Improving Innovation, Collaboration, and Access", addressing the critical yet unacknowledged role public libraries play in delivering E-government services to the American people. Witnesses included:

All of the witnesses had interesting things to say, and Schwartz's testimony included mention of a just-released report from the CDT and OMB Watch called, "Hiding in Plain Sight: Why Important Government Information Cannot Be Found Through Commercial Search Engines." I really hope that the committee members hear both the great advantages that e-government can have for citizens AND the great need for much more financial support to public libraries and other organizations on the front line of e-government services. The great fallacy of new Web technologies and social media is that these tools will allow governments, libraries and other public service organizations to save money and cut physical service points. YES, e-government helps get services into citizens' hands, BUT these new technologies also necessitate MORE spending on public service points. What agencies (and libraries) seem to think is that if they have a Web service, then they don't need a physical service. But, like IM in libraries, you can't just cut hours of your service point. Instead, you need MORE staff to be able to handle the Web service and the inevitable increase in service requests (both in-person and online). ALA statement on e-government (PDF)
"Libraries strongly support the E-government Act, since it has enhanced access to government information. However, since its enactment, public libraries are often the only organizations that can help individuals interact with government agencies and access E-government services... Libraries have a critical role in E-Government not only as portals to access, but also organizing and categorizing information and providing the necessary tools and expertise to provide community service. Librarians provide the front line reference service that informs the public how to access and evaluate government information through both physical and virtual collections and how to train people in the use of electronic resources. Libraries help the public become information literate... Public libraries are open to taking on the challenge of E-government initiatives, yet the library community has seen little collaboration or support from federal agencies for the significant increase in services public libraries provide on their behalf... -- Lynne Bradley, Director of ALA's Office of Government Relations
Continue reading

Continue Reading →

What is wrong with Fusion Centers

A new ACLU report says that government "fusion centers" have not been planned in a public, open manner and that some are engaging in improper intelligence activities and endanger the privacy of citizens.

This report is intended to serve as a primer that explains what fusion centers are, and how and why they were created. It details potential problems fusion centers present to the privacy and civil liberties of ordinary Americans, including: Ambiguous Lines of Authority... Private Sector Participation... Military Participation... Data Mining... and Excessive Secrecy.
See also: Groups seek definition of terrorism at government and private sector information-sharing centers.

 

Continue reading

Continue Reading →

CongressTube?

Congress Wants To Allow New Web Tools by Aliya Sternstein, National Journal's Technology Daily, December 12, 2007 PM edition [subscription required]

Congress is slowly moving ahead with rule changes that would allow House members and senators to enhance their Web sites with links and content from commercial sites, like social networks and video-sharing services.
Options under consideration include permitting members to use video-streaming sites if the sites are ad-free and protect the uploaded material from tampering.
Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Archives

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM