Calls for Comment on Proposed Federal Data Collections

I'm forwarding this heads-up from the Association of Public Data Users (APDU) list. Over the last two weeks, there have been quite a few calls for comment on proposed data collections published in the Federal Register (see below with due date). Maybe it's because I haven't had my coffee yet this morning, but I was a little peeved by my failed information search. I found the Census Bureau's FR posting (Federal Register: January 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 4) Page 672) (btw, I tried in FDsys.gpo.gov but they've not loaded Volume 74 yet) but at first was stymied because the summary page has no link to the Census Bureau's Web site, and does not have contact information or any link to more information. The full listing has the information, but comments must be written, no Web submissions :-| Ok fine, I go to www.census.gov and after more than 5 minutes of search/browse, give up on finding exactly *how* to submit comments on the proposed "Quarterly Financial Report" or "Survey of Local Government Finances." What's even worse, census.gov does not have a "contact us" link on it's first page. I finally found it in the footer of a second level page, but could find nothing in the Question and Answer Center about RFCs, proposed data sets etc. *sigh* I guess this is turning into an FDsys comment. I noticed in FDsys that you can sign up to receive the daily Federal Register Table of Contents which is cool. But there needs to be a way to browse only the requests for comments (or rules changes, notices...) of specific agencies in the FR as well as receive email or RSS of requests for comments. There also needs to be a link in the FR to the agency in question and not just their top level site but to the place on the site with information on the RFC and directions for how to submit comments. And lastly (this is not an FDsys comment but a general agency comment) RFCs should be submitted online. So go ahead and submit comments for the proposed data collections below, I dare you.

  • Census Bureau
    Quarterly Financial Report (February 9, 2009)
    Survey of Local Government Finances (School Systems) (March 13, 2009)
  • Office of Management and Budget
    2007 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)-Updates for 2012 (April 7, 2009)
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Labor Market Information (LMI) Cooperative Agreement (March 3, 2009)
  • Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor
    O*Net Data Collection Program (January 30, 2009)
  • Science Resources Statistics, National Science Foundation
    Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges (March 10, 2009)
  • National Institutes of Health
    Information Program on Clinical Trials: Maintaining a Registry and Results Databank (February 5, 2009)
  • Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services
    Feasibility Test for Design Phase of National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (February 5, 2009)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services
    The AHRQ Data Inventory (January 30, 2009)
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services
    CAHPS Home Health Care Survey (March 10, 2009)
  • Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
    Class I Railroad Annual Report (February 9, 2009)
    Quarterly Report of Freight Commodity Statistics (February 9, 2009)
Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Electronic System for Travel Authorization’s (ESTA) Approval Required for Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Travelers to Visit the U.S.

From today onwards, travelers from the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries must get approved via the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) before they fly to the United States. “ESTA is a web-based system, initially launched in August 2008, that determines the preliminary eligibility of visitors to travel under the VWP prior to boarding a carrier to the United States.” The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) declared that all nationals of the VWP countries must follow the new regulation when they travel to the U.S. Currently, the countries that are under the VWP program are: Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brunei, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Technology and the Obama Administration

Here is a good overview of some of the technology issues and opportunities that the Obama administration will be dealing with soon.

Mentioned as a key contender for the position as the first-ever chief technology officer (CTO) for the federal government is Vivek Kundra, Washington D.C.'s CTO, where he has demonstrated the possibility of using technology to truly enhance government information. The article notes that the relationship between the federal CTO and the current position of administrator of e-government and information technology at OMB will need to be defined and that the CTO "will have to convince department heads to dedicate enough resources to overhaul the way they generate information."
For example, instead of static Web pages and disparate formats, such as PDF files and other kinds of database-generated files that each department comes up with when presenting public information, each department may have to start standardizing the formats of their streams of information so that those seeking access will find it more useable and ready to analyze. One example of this idea already underway is at the SEC, which has required since Jan. 1 that all public corporations and mutual funds file their financial reports in a specific Web format known as eXtensible Business Reporting Language. The idea is that the information would become more accessible on the Web, and to the public at large. The information would be available in a format that Web applications and spiders could more easily interpret than a simple text of PDF file. As a result, it would become more accessible to the public in a more timely fashion -- rather than being buried and obscured in a database.
In a 2007 interview at Google with YouTube's News and Politics Editor Steve Grove, Obama said
"If we can apply technology to some of the biggest issues we face, [such as ] health care, energy, or education, then we can leap over some of the problems that have been plaguing us for a very, very long time. And one of the things that I've seen is that technology gets pushed aside as something separate, when in fact, it's really an opportunity to make progress that we haven't seen in a long time."
Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Congress on YouTube

Congress Comes to YouTube, by Steve Grove, YouTube blog, January 12, 2009. YouTube Teams With Congress to Show Lawmakers at Work By Miguel Helft, New York Times, January 12, 2009.

On Monday, YouTube, in collaboration with Congress, will unveil two new Web pages, one for the House and one for the Senate, where every lawmaker will be able to create a video channel on the site. Already several members of Congress have channels on YouTube. But by creating a central hub for all senators and representatives, YouTube is hoping to encourage more members to create their own channels, not only as a place to promote their agendas but also as a forum for interacting with citizens.
The Senate Hub: youtube.com/senatehub The House Hub youtube.com/househub Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Not Your Father’s Censorship

Not Your Father's Censorship, Quasi-monopolies and wary governments curb Web freedoms, by HARRY LEWIS, The Chronicle of Higher Education: "The Chronicle Review", Volume 55, Issue 19, Page B9. [subscription required, but freely available here for a short time]

Now, with almost everything digitized, new communication technologies have led to a global proliferation of censorship agents, methods, and rationales.... Should we feel comfortable relying almost exclusively on private companies to help us find the truth, when we cannot know what version of the truth they are showing us?... Storing information and making it available are now service businesses, and therein lies another censorship opportunity.... U.S. copyright law is such a heavy club that it can abet censorship by parties that simply object to what people are saying about them....
Harry Lewis is a professor of computer science at Harvard University and a fellow of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society. He is a co-author of Blown to Bits: Your Life, Liberty, and Happiness After the Digital Explosion (Addison-Wesley, 2008). Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Archives

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM