Home » Posts tagged 'fdlp' (Page 51)

Tag Archives: fdlp

Our mission

Free Government Information (FGI) is a place for initiating dialogue and building consensus among the various players (libraries, government agencies, non-profit organizations, researchers, journalists, etc.) who have a stake in the preservation of and perpetual free access to government information. FGI promotes free government information through collaboration, education, advocacy and research.

David Rosenthal says “Do it for Preservation!”

David Rosenthal is a member of Stanford's LOCKSS development team who maintains a blog about his professional work. It is well worth reading and deserves a place in everyone's list of RSS feeds. In a June 10, 2007 posting on reasons to preserve e-journals, David explains that multiple, independently hosted government publications are a good thing because they are TAMPER EVIDENT:

The goal of the FDLP was to provide citizens with ready access to their government's information. But, even though this wasn't the FDLP's primary purpose, it provided a remarkably effective preservation system. It created a large number of copies of the material to be preserved, the more important the material, the more copies. These copies were on low-cost, durable, write-once, tamper-evident media. They were stored in a large number of independently administered repositories, some in different jurisdictions. They are indexed in such a way that it is easy to find some of the copies, but hard to be sure that you have found them all. Preserved in this way, the information was protected from most of the threats to which stored information is subject. The FDLP's massive degree of replication protected against media decay, fire, flood, earthquake, and so on. The independent administration of the repositories protected against human error, incompetence and many types of process failures. But, perhaps most important, the system made the record tamper evident. Winston Smith in "1984" was "a clerk for the Ministry of Truth, where his job is to rewrite historical documents so that they match the current party line". George Orwell wasn't a prophet. Throughout history, governments of all stripes have found the need to employ Winston Smiths and the US government is no exception. Government documents are routinely recalled from the FDLP, and some are re-issued after alteration. An illustration is Volume XXVI of Foreign Relations of the United States, the official history of the US State Department. It covers Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and the Philippines between 1964 and 1968. It was completed in 1997 and underwent a 4-year review process. Shortly after publication in 2001, the fact that it included official admissions of US complicity in the murder of at least 100,000 Indonesian "communists"by Suharto's forces became an embarrassment, and the CIA attempted to prevent distribution. This effort became public, and was thwarted when the incriminating material was leaked to the National Security Archive and others. The important property of the FDLP is that in order to suppress or edit the record of government documents, the administration of the day has to write letters, or send US Marshals, to a large number of libraries around the country. It is hard to do this without attracting attention, as happened with Volume XXVI. Attracting attention to the fact that you are attempting to suppress or re-write history is self-defeating. This deters most attempts to do it, and raises the bar of desperation needed to try. It also ensures that, without really extraordinary precautions, even if an attempt succeeds it will not do so without trace. That is what tamper-evident means. It is almost impossible to make the record tamper-proof against the government in power, but the paper FDLP was a very good implementation of a tamper-evident record.
You'll notice that David refers to the depository program in the past tense. He does so because, like GPO itself, he sees the Future Digital System (FDSys) as an inevitable total replacement:
It should have become evident by now that I am using the past tense when describing the FDLP. The program is ending and being replaced by FDSys. This is in effect a single huge web server run by the GPO on which all government documents will be published. The argument is that through the Web citizens have much better and more immediate access to government information than through an FDLP library. That's true, but FDSys is also Winston Smith's dream machine, providing a point-and-click interface to instant history suppression and re-writing.
David thinks this is a bad thing, GPO assures us it is a good thing, but both assume this is where we are going. But it doesn't have to be this way. We in the FDLP are definitely "Not Dead Yet!" We have a vital role to play in continuing to preserve the tangible materials entrusted into our care. Further, hundreds of new tangible titles are being shipped each month by GPO to the 1200 plus federal depository libraries. And while the depository community hasn't exactly leaped up and embraced their responsibility to preserve federal electronic publications, individual libraries like the University of North Texas and the New Mexico State Library have. Together with others who have held views on preservation similar to David's for years these libraries will help build the depository system of the future. Or we can sit back and let Winston Smith control our government information. If you are a government information specialist, it's up to you. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Urgent appeal on GPO funding votes

Free Government Information endorses this "urgent appeal" posted on Govdoc-L yesterday. Thanks to Kevin McClure for keeping all of us informed:

I want to draw your attention to important votes on GPO funding that are expected within days. And I want to make a particularly urgent appeal to those of you who live or work in a district represented by any of the members of the House or Senate Legislative Branch Subcommittees: HOUSE MAJORITY Chair: Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-20th) Barbara Lee (CA-9th) Tom Udall (NM-3rd) Michael Honda (CA-15th) Betty McCollum (MN-4th) C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger (MD-2nd) Dave Obey (WI-7th), Ex Officio MINORITY Ranking Member: Zach Wamp (TN-3rd) Ray LaHood (IL-18th) John T. Doolittle (CA-4th) Jerry Lewis (CA-41st), Ex Officio SENATE MAJORITY Chair: Mary Landrieu (LA) Richard Durbin (IL) Ben Nelson (NE) MINORITY Ranking Member: Wayne Allard (CO) Lamar Alexander (TN) These Subcommittees will soon vote on GPO's FY2008 funding request, and it will be crucial for them to hear from Depository Librarians and others who work with government information about the many ways that GPO products and services, in partnership with librarians, are used to meet the information needs of their constituents. This year's budget situation is extremely tight, but full funding of GPO's FY2008 appropriations request of $181.97 million is critical to the forward development of GPO's ambitious Future Digital System (FDSys) with which we are all familiar. The Subcommittees need to hear from us about critical programs that were not funded under the current budget year's continuing resolution, including $2 million for the legally mandated printing and distribution of the 2006 U.S. Code, and another $8 million under GPO's Salaries & Expenses appropriation for GPO's ongoing digital initiatives. GPO Access, currently in the midst of a major upgrade, needs full funding so that the thousands of citizens who use it each day have the most modern and fully functional information retrieval system possible at their disposal. And while digital access is a tremendous boon for most users, print distribution is still essential for those legal resources for which print remains the only official and authentic format. Most importantly, they need to hear our stories about how important a vibrant and vital GPO is to our ability as librarians to serve their constituents. GPO deserves enormous credit for its unprecedentedly rapid and dramatic transition from a primarily tangible-product publishing operation to a primarily digital one, but less than full funding threatens to slow that migration, leaving some elements of their plan to promote permanent public access to vital government information unfinished. Congress, which pressed GPO to make this transition, must now be encouraged to embrace it in a way that allows GPO to finish the job on time. Time is extremely short. Action is expected before Memorial Day; it could come any time. A phone call or fax would be the most timely and powerful way to make your case. House member contact information is available at http://www.house.gov/ ; the website of the Subcommittee on Legislative Branch is at http://appropriations.house.gov/Subcommittees/sub_leg.shtml . On the Senate side, contact information is at http://www.senate.gov and the subcomitte's website is http://appropriations.senate.gov/legislative.cfm. It's up to us to make sure the members of both subcommittees understand the value of the services they'll be voting on. If you need help in the wording of your phone call or fax, consider the points given below. By all means, feel free to adapt the wording to your library's particular needs and your own personal experience and point of view; a message that has a specific reference to your district or community is always the most meaningful. Although time does not permit sending by regular mail, if sending by fax you should include your representative's full Capitol Hill mailing address along with the fax number. SAMPLE MESSAGE The Honorable ______ {address} {fax no.} Dear (Representative/Senator) ______ , I am writing to urge you, as a member of the Subcommittee on Legislative Branch, to support the full FY2008 funding request of the U.S. Government Printing Office. GPO has made a powerful response to calls from Congress and other stakeholders to bring the dissemination of Federal government information into the 21st century. Now GPO needs the funding to ensure that none of the elements of this transformation are left unfinished. GPO's electronic initiatives are needed to replace obsolete technology and upgrade electronic services. The Salaires & Expenses request includes crucial funding to improve the GPO Access system, currently in the midst of a major upgrade, so that the thousands of citizens who use it each day have the most modern and fully functional information retrieval system possible at their disposal. This request will also enable GPO to catalog thousands of documents harvested from agency Web sites and develop authentic online publications. While digital dissemination has made many publications easier to find and use, print is still the most useful format for certain types of information and certain categories of users. Funding is needed to ensure that the 2006 U.S. Code and the essential congressional resources of the 110th Congress are published and distributed to depository libraries in a timely manner. And print is still essential in the legal community because print remains the only format that is both official and authentic. GPO's request for the revolving fund includes $10.5 million for the continuing development of the Future Digital System (FDSysy), which is essential to GPO's future. With your funding support to complete FDsys, the first public release will be next December. Full funding to support a vigorous GPO, working with its partners in the Federal Depository Library Program and all libraries which use government information, will help ensure that your constituents have easy, no-fee access to Federal government information, both current and historic. I urge you to fund fully GPO's FY 2008 budget request. Thank you very much. Sincerely,
For more background on this issue, please see our posting where we highlighted testimony provided by Mary Alice Baish on behalf of AALL and SLA. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Does it still cost libraries $4 bucks for every GPO dollar?

One of the ways we FGI volunteers try to keep up with the government information news is through the use of Google Alerts. Sometimes these "new alerts" dredge up old information that is still of interest. For example, today's alert looking for instances of "Free Government Information", brought out this interesting item from the new ERIC database: ERIC #: EJ491407 Title: Costing Out a Depository Library: What Free Government Information? Authors: Dugan, Robert E.; Dodsworth, Ellen M. Source: Government Information Quarterly, v11 n3 p261-84 1994 Back in 1994, the authors came to this somewhat startling conclusion in their abstract:

In 1993, the Georgetown University library spent over four dollars to support its depository program for every dollar the Government Printing Office spent to distribute the information. Methods used to calculate costs, cost-sharing issues, and suggested action are discussed. Appendixes include a summary of the cost-compilation model and a selective bibliography. (Contains 30 references.) (KRN)
Anyone out know if this is still true? Although printed output of government is down drastically, people still need to discover, describe and provide access to government information resources. A quick browse of the first two screens of ERIC documents related to Depository Libraries took me back to 2001 without a similar study. Please let us know about more recent studies in the comments section. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Praise for GPO and “bootleg” withdrawal

As James Staub noted a few days ago, GPO has posted crystal clear audio of the recently closed Spring 2007 Depository Library Council meeting on a new podcasts page. GPO's page is a true podcast since they offer a subscription through iTunes. Thanks GPO! Comparing their page with our podcast page, they have everything we had with the exception of the LOCKSS session. They also had several other sessions our recorder couldn't get to. Therefore, as a gesture of goodwill, we have pulled our less than perfect audio files from our podcast feed with the exception of the LOCKSS session. We congratulate GPO on its fine and swift work in making the work of the Council available to the entire community. Assuming this is the way and schedule that GPO plans to provide future DLC/FDLP conference content, we will cease our duplication of audio effort, though we'll still continue to post participant notes. Keep up the great work! Continue reading

Continue Reading →

AALL & SLA Support GPO Funding, Will you?

On May 1, 2007, Mary Alice Baish of the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) testified in support of full funding for the Government Printing Office (GPO) before the House Committee on Appropriations for AALL and the Special Libraries Association (SLA). While readers know that FGI has its differences with GPO, it plays a vital role in informing American citizens through its publishing, the Federal Depository Library Program, and of course, GPO Access. In addition, GPO's proposed Future Digital System (FDSys) could be a vital PART of any government information ecosystem of the future. Like every other federal agency, GPO has been operating under a continuing resolution which held it to FY 2006 funding even though we are nearly at FY 2008. As Mary Alice points out, fully funding GPO’s request of $45.61 million for the Salaries and Expenses (S&E) account that funds the FDLP; $109.54 million for Congressional Printing and Binding; and $26.82 million for the revolving fund is vital for several reason including:

  • The S&E request includes necessary funds for the cataloging, indexing, and distribution of Federal publications in print and electronic formats to depository libraries and other recipients designated by law.
  • Providing money for digitizing pre-1976 cataloging records; cataloging documents harvested from agency Web sites and improving the GPO Access system.
  • To provide GPO with GPO with the ability publish all the important congressional documents of the 110th Congress. In addition, $5 million of the CP&B request is needed to ensure that the 2006 U.S. Code, compiled by the Law Revision Counsel, is published and distributed to members of Congress and depository libraries in a timely fashion.
  • Provide the last third of funding to bring FDSys online.
  • Helping GPO to fulfill its partnership agreements with libraries around the country.
The full statement is well worth reading and I hope it encourages you to support GPO's funding request by getting you to write your Members of Congress polite but firm letters insisting they fund the government's basic responsibility to inform citizens of its activities. Thank you SLA and AALL! Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Latest Posts

Latest Comments

Blogroll

Archives

Meta

Archives

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM