New Poll – Social Software
It's a new month and so time for a new poll. Please stop by the front page or go directly to the poll and let us know what your favorite social software is. There's an option for people who think social software is a fad, and we'd like to here from you too, especially if you have comments. Last month's poll taught us that most of you don't have time for commenting and that's fine. But do vote in our poll. We at FGI believe that raising public awareness of government information is key to keeping access to it private, free and of course fully functional. Social Networks and other "Web 2.0" tools give us a whole new tool set to spread the word as far and wide as possible. So we'd like to get some feedback on the Web 2.0 tools we've heard of and maybe learn about a few more. As always, if you really love looking at old polls, they are still available. Continue reading
New Videos / Send us yours!
We've posted two new govdocs videos to our audio/video promotion page. The videos are:
- Marines Get Around! (approximately 1 min, posted 12/24/2006) - Roundup of documents showing how active Marines have been in our nation's history. Posted to CHBN, YouTube, and MySpace.
- Shield of Freedom (2 min, posted 12/30/2006) - USCG documents set to the tune Coast Guard's Chief Petty Officers March.
GAO Analyzes Smithsonian/Showtime Deal
As a follow-up to our previous story on the media deal between the Showtime Channel and the Smithsonian Institution, FGI would like to draw the attention of our readers to this General Accountability Office report on the deal: Smithsonian Institution: Additional Information Should Be Developed and Provided to Filmmakers on the Impact of the Showtime Contract, GAO-07-275, December 15, 2006 They conclude in part:
It is too early to determine the long-term impact of the contract. Access to the Smithsonian's collections and staff for research purposes remains unchanged, but the direct impact on filmmakers will depend largely on how many request permission to use a substantial amount of Smithsonian content. So far, 6 of 117 filming requests have involved a substantial amount of Smithsonian content--2 were denied and 4 were approved as exceptions. The Smithsonian contends that it will be able to accommodate the same level of filming activity as it has in the past based on its historical analysis of filming contracts. GAO found that this analysis was unreliable because it was based on incomplete data and oversimplified criteria. In addition, concerns have been raised about damage to the Smithsonian's image and the appropriateness of limiting the use of the collections held in trust for the American public.Hmm, what is appropriate about the limiting the use of the collections held in trust for the American public? I can't really think of anything. Can you? The report suggests that the Smithsonian might see as much as $150 million from this deal after 10 years. While this may seem like a lot, this amount could only fund about 13 hours of our current occupation in Iraq. This is estimated from the Iraq Study Group's estimate of $8/billion per month. Couldn't we spare a day's worth of Iraq funding this year to make deals that limit national collections unnecessary? Continue reading
Signing Statement Page Update
The President decided to ignore some reporting requirements in a Palestinian Authority related bill, and we've updated our Presidential Signing Statements page to tell you how. Continue reading
20061221 – No to information on who is aiding Palestian Authority
On December 21, 2006, President Bush signed S. 2370, the "Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006" , but made a statement indicating he intends to ignore reporting requirements:
The executive branch shall construe section 3(b) of the Act, which relates to access to certain information by a legislative agent, and section 11 of the Act, which relates to a report on certain assistance by foreign countries, international organizations, or multilateral development banks, in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to withhold information that could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties.According to the final version of the bill on Congress' Thomas web site, here are the "offending sections" in the President's view: Section 3(b):
`(b) Exceptions- Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the following: `(1) ASSISTANCE TO MEET BASIC HUMAN NEEDS- Assistance to meet food, water, medicine, health, or sanitation needs, or other assistance to meet basic human needs. `(2) ASSISTANCE TO PROMOTE DEMOCRACY- Assistance to promote democracy, human rights, freedom of the press, non-violence, reconciliation, and peaceful coexistence, provided that such assistance does not directly benefit Hamas or any other foreign terrorist organization. `(3) ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE PALESTINIAN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL- Assistance, other than funding of salaries or salary supplements, to individual members of the Palestinian Legislative Council who the President determines are not members of Hamas or any other foreign terrorist organization, for the purposes of facilitating the attendance of such members in programs for the development of institutions of democratic governance, including enhancing the transparent and accountable operations of such institutions, and providing support for the Middle East peace process. `(4) OTHER TYPES OF ASSISTANCE- Any other type of assistance if the President-- `(A) determines that the provision of such assistance is in the national security interest of the United States; and `(B) not less than 30 days prior to the obligation of amounts for the provision of such assistance-- `(i) consults with the appropriate congressional committees regarding the specific programs, projects, and activities to be carried out using such assistance; and `(ii) submits to the appropriate congressional committees a written memorandum that contains the determination of the President under subparagraph (A).Section 11:
SEC. 11. REPORTING REQUIREMENT. Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that-- (1) describes the steps that have been taken by the United States Government to ensure that other countries and international organizations, including multilateral development banks, do not provide direct assistance to the Palestinian Authority for any period for which a certification described in section 620K(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as added by section 2(b)(2) of this Act) is not in effect with respect to the Palestinian Authority; and (2) identifies any countries and international organizations, including multilateral development banks, that are providing direct assistance to the Palestinian Authority during such a period, and describes the nature and amount of such assistance.FGI leaves it to others to interpret section 3(b) above, but in denying the validity of Section 11, the President appears to be saying that he considers mere reporting of aid to the Palestinians by other nations and groups to be harmful to the national interest. Does this mean that the Administration is aware of non-humanitarian aid to the Hamas-led government, but doesn't want to make that public? If so, it must be coming from our "allies" in the Mideast, since presumably Iranian or Syrian Aid would be splashed across the front pages of papers. These are the kinds of questions we are left with by a secretive administration. How many of these signing statement will it take to convince Congress that any "compromise" legislation based on reporting requirements in exchange for new powers or resources is doomed to failure? Will this pattern of allowing the administration to pick and choose from the laws it obeys continue with the new Congressional majority? FGI hopes so. Continue reading
Latest Comments