FDSys Blog Lives! Now how about some content?
A few days ago, I wrote the obituary of the FDSys Blog. The rumors I started of its death were premature. June 1st they posted an item providing an update of their Request for Proposal. I still think that six months without a blog entry is inappropriate for an active blog. The new technologies office could be using this blog to educate the documents community. For example, they could do a series on the FDsys Requirements Document, going through it section by section and trying to render it into plain English for us. Or they could talk about how they are working with agencies to get content into FDSys, or how the push mechanism might work. If they could just find something to post once a week or even once a month, the FDSys Blog could be a great educational tool. If they're going to stick to erratic postings separated by months, then the FDSys folks would be better off just having a "What's New" section on their main site. Continue reading
Digital Preservation and the Open Web
Computers in Libraries recently posted presentation slides and handouts from the 2006 Computers in Libraries conference. While I thought several presentations above would be of interest to FGI readers, I think that Digital Preservation & the Open Web should be read by all documents librarians and Government Printing Office (GPO) staff. This presentation is a report on the web at risk project and focuses on the role that libraries have to play in identifying and preserving important web content that the commercial sector might not have an interest in mainitaining for us. Looking through the project partners, I was interested in seeing eight FDLP (depository) libraries from the UC system on the list. I hope that someone from one of those libraries can write in with what their involvement is. Decentralization is beautiful. Thanks to the "Web at Risk" project for helping to make it happen. Continue reading
Pt. 6: Nonlawyer’s journey through Title 44: Requirements of depository libraries
This post, all earlier postings in this series, and my "not a lawyer" disclaimer can be found at http://freegovinfo.info/title44 or through our library under Nonlawyer's Journey through Title 44. In my last Title 44 installment, I covered 44 USC 1905. Today I vault over several sections relating to types of depository libraries to land on 44 USC 1909, Sec. 1909. Requirements of depository libraries; reports on conditions; investigations; termination; replacement. I don't believe the sections I skipped are central to the Depository Library Program, but if you disagree, explain why in the comments or by e-mail to dnlcornwall AT alaska.net. Back to section 1909. This is the section of the depository law that lays out the basic expectations of depository libraries. This is the minimum that members of the public should expect from depository libraries. If these expectations aren't met, then there are ways to kick libraries out of the program. See more analysis after reading through 44 USC 1909:
ITLE 44--PUBLIC PRINTING AND DOCUMENTS CHAPTER 19--DEPOSITORY LIBRARY PROGRAM Sec. 1909. Requirements of depository libraries; reports on conditions; investigations; termination; replacement Only a library able to provide custody and service for depository materials and located in an area where it can best serve the public need, and within an area not already adequately served by existing depository libraries may be designated by Senators, Representatives, the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, the Commissioner of the District of Columbia,\1\ or the Governors of Guam, American Samoa, or the Virgin Islands as a depository of Government publications. The designated depository libraries shall report to the Superintendent of Documents at least every two years concerning their condition. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Transfer of Functions note below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Superintendent of Documents shall make firsthand investigation of conditions for which need is indicated and include the results of investigations in his annual report. When he ascertains that the number of books in a depository library is below ten thousand, other than Government publications, or it has ceased to be maintained so as to be accessible to the public, or that the Government publications which have been furnished the library have not been properly maintained, he shall delete the library from the list of depository libraries if the library fails to correct the unsatisfactory conditions within six months. The Representative or the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico in whose area the library is located or the Senator who made the designation, or a successor of the Senator, and, in the case of a library in the District of Columbia, the Commissioner of the District of Columbia, and, in the case of a library in Guam, American Samoa, or the Virgin Islands, the Governor, shall be notified and shall then be authorized to designate another library within the area served by him, which shall meet the conditions herein required, but which may not be in excess of the number of depository libraries authorized by laws within the State, district, territory, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, as the case may be. (Pub. L. 90-620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1285.) Historical and Revision Notes Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., Sec. 86 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, Sec. 70, 28 Stat. 612; Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87-579, Sec. 6, 76 Stat. 354). Transfer of Functions Office of Commissioner of District of Columbia, as established under Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1967, eff. Nov. 3, 1967 (in part), 32 F.R. 11669, 81 Stat. 948, abolished as of noon Jan. 2, 1975, by Pub. L. 93-198, title VII, Sec. 711, Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 818, and replaced by office of Mayor of District of Columbia by section 421 of Pub. L. 93-198. Section Referred to in Other Sections This section is referred to in section 1916 of this title.Section 1909 places the following requirements on Federal Depository Libraries:
- Must be able to provide custody for depository materials.
- Must be able to provide service for depository materials.
- Must make a biennial report on their condition to the Government Printing Office (GPO).
- Must contain at least 10,000 books in their non-depository collections.
- Must be open to the public.
- Government publications which have been furnished to the library must be properly maintained
FDSys Blog – RIP?
The GPO staff tasked with developing the Future Digital System (FDSys) launched a blog in May 2005 to communicate with the potential user and developer communities. Although never properly or officially promoted to the depository community, we at FGI hailed its launch as a forward-looking way of gathering feedback and offering the potential for dialog between system designers and potential users. In my personal view, it never developed that way. It did have a useful role in announcing new FDSys documents and requesting feedback. After some pointed questions about policy neutral systems, the people running the FDSys blog announced that henceforth they would only respond to "appropriate questions." Even after that though, new announcements would occaisionally be made. No more, it seems. While new developments about FDSys have been made through other channels, there have been no new postings on the FDSys blog since January 24, 2006. Four months in Internet time is ages, so I'm making the assumption that the experiment in rapid-two way collaboration is effectively ended. On the positive side, perhaps they're too busy building to have time blogging. But I hope it is something that GPO will try again in the future when they have time to write and the community has time to listen. Continue reading
All Title 44 musings in one place
Recently we've had a FGI user or two ask us to collect my "Nonlawyer's journey through Title 44" posting in one place. We hear you! For what they're worth, you can find everything in this series at http://freegovinfo.info/title44. I've appreciated hearing from those of you who have found this series helpful so far. I'm also interested in ideas for improvements. Whether or not it falls under your idea of improvements, I will try to make more frequent postings, at least once a week and hopefully twice a week until I'm done with what I consider to be the major provisions of Title 44. Continue reading
Latest Comments