Critical GPO systems and the FDLP cloud
[Update: 10/13/09: I've revised my thinking on the cloud as the term is loaded and doesn't really mean what I'm describing. A friend from the San Diego Supercomputer Center said, "some greybeards are going back to the original metaphor: the grid" and suggested the term "shared digital libraries" which is good. But what I'm describing is more like a biological ecosystem, the FDLP ecosystem. jrj]
Last week's GPO purl server crash should be disconcerting to both the documents community and the public at large (in fact, although the hardware's been restored, resolution is ongoing as I write). I know GPO staff are just as worried about this and are doing everything they can to fix the purl server.
"The PURL Server is currently inaccessible. GPO is working with IT staff to restore service as soon as possible. We regret any inconvenience caused by the server problems. An updated listserv will be sent once service is restored."
But in the meantime, there are 1250+ library catalogs and innumerable links to government documents that are not working. The crash of a critical piece of GPO's infrastructure brings a couple of things to mind:
1) What worries me about this is that FDsys and it's supposed upgrade in hardware/software/systems design is for all intents and purposes the same as GPOaccess. That is, FDsys is a monolith where the failure of one piece can cause the whole system to ground to a halt. As our readers know, we've been advocating for a long time for a distributed digital FDLP (a *true* "digital depository" system!). We're heartened by what we see of FDsys so far, but we need to be building a system with built-in redundancies.
I envision a collaborative and distributed system of digital content, collaborative cataloging/metadata creation, as well as technical infrastructure. With this kind of system in place, a failed purl server will only cause a momentary blip in service as a backup purl server kicks on instead of a several week+ outage. How many system degradations (WAIS) and failures (purl server) until we shift our thinking from "client-server" (with libraries decidedly on the "client" side of the equation) to "Peer-to-peer" concepts and build systems with built-in redundancies that mirror what the FDLP has been for the last 150 years? How long before we build an FDLP cloud?










PURL restoration progress
As of last Friday about 3,300 of the 116,237 PURLs had been restored (2.8%). As of today (Monday, August 31), 3,677 PURLs have been restored (3.1%). That's a restoration rate of 0.3% on one day. Looks like we are in this for the long haul. Since the PURL server has gone down, I have had 23 users denied access to government information via PURLs in our OPAC at the University of Denver.
Keep those purl updates coming
Thanks Chris for the status of purl restoration. It's also good to put a human face on this by analyzing catalog click-throughs. Please keep those updates coming so the community can keep abreast of the purl update status.
Continued PURLs Turnaways
As far as I can see today (Wednesday, Sept. 2) none of the GPO PURLs are working. Since the PURL server has been down I have had 45 users turned away from government information. When I see the records that were clicked on, I go into these records and add an 856 field above the PURL, with a note saying: "Direct access to online version", with a link to the actual URL. For example, see: http://130.253.4.23/record=b3713524~S3
purl server update #3 posted by GPO staff
This was posted to govdoc-l on friday. So it looks like the purl server will be fixed early next week.
This reminds me that there was a very good suggestion on purl-dev list that I think the depository community should be pushing:
Any libraries willing to host a mirror of a purl mysql database?
purl server update #4 posted by GPO staff
GPO sent the following update around yesterday on the latest regarding the purl server crash. As of yesterday, they're up to 114,000 purls out of 15,000+. So it would seem that we're in the home stretch.
purl server update #5 posted by GPO staff
It seems that the purl server issues are still being worked on. The length of time that this has been going on is disconcerting.
purl server update #6 posted by GPO staff
well at least this technological bump was quickly troubeshot. more soon.
Post new comment