Handout for DLC

Attached is the handout that I'll be distributing at the Spring DLC in Albuquerque, NM. Stay tuned for blog posts/updates from the conference. Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

Spring 2005 Depository Library Council Meeting April 17-20

Thanks to all of our contributors!

If you attended the Spring 2005 Depository Library Council meeting (meeting update is available here), would you please either post a comment about a session you attended, or send your notes to dnlcornwall@alaska.net. If you e-mail your notes, please let us know if FGI can post your name and/or affliation.

DLC handouts

Depository Presenters - If you presented at one of the sessions, and you have a presentation or a handout, please send us a link or the file itself.

Session List by Day

Sunday April 17, 2005

  1. 10:00 - 1:00 New Attendees Orientation
  2. 11:00 - 12:00 Depository Library 101
  3. 1:30 - 3:00 GPO Update
  4. 3:30 - 5:00 Plenary Session - Mayor's Welcome
  5. 7:00 - 8:30 Optional Government Information Quarterly Continue reading →

    Continue Reading →

More on GPO’s “public-private partnership RFI”

The questions I have about the current RFI relate less to how GPO and FDLP and the bookstores and sales program worked and interacted in the past and more to how new partnerships and plans might affect free, fully-functional, permanent access to government information in the future. I am concerned that GPO's business strategies and its new "Strategic Vision" will affect free public access to digital publications as well as to paper-and-ink documents. In terms of paper-and-ink documents, it is possible that a robust, successful paper-and-ink sales program would benefit FDLP by getting more publications into the FDLP distribution stream. On the other hand, it is possible that successful sales will lead to the removal from FDLP of publications that can earn a profit as they migrate into the private sector. And, as Scott Matheson pointed out here recently, it is also possible that less profitable documents would not be ordered for the sales program, and if not very popular, not ordered for depository distribution. Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

Attn: Spring DLC Attendees – We want your notes for new feature

We at freegovinfo.info want to help GPO have a faster and more complete picture of public DLC meetings and other GPO sessions at library association events.

So, we're initiating "Grassroots Proceedings," where we are asking you, the documents communities to contribute your notes and impressions of PUBLIC FDLP-related events. If you're fortunate enough to have private lunches with the Public Printer or the SuDoc, please DO NOT send us those notes. This isn't a game of "gotcha journalism." We only want to better publicize public sessions to avoid situations like the Midwinter flap where GPO's plans went unclarified for months. The more information the government information community has, the better partners we can be with GPO.

You can contribute in two ways. You can either send your notes and impressions to dnlcornwall@alaska.net and let us know whether we can use your name and institution when we post the notes to our "Grassroots Proceedings" page. Or once the "Grassroots Proceedings" page is set up, you will be able to directly contribute comments. Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

Digital Preservation Costs – Migration vs. Emulation

The current issue of RLG DigiNews discusses two possible approaches to preserving digital objects: migration and emulation in terms of costs over the life of the objects.

Migration is moving electronic files from one application to another - say from WordPerfect to the latest edition of word. Emulation is designing software and sometimes hardware that will mimic a desired operating system - say a Macintosh with SoftWindows. Both approaches have merit, and both have problems. Some of the problems arise from proprietary formats protected by trade secrets. If you can't describe the specifications of a WordPerfect file exactly, you'll have trouble rendering it in Word or future word processors (the pink-strikethrough effect).

Another thing that the two approaches have is ongoing costs, discussed in the RLG Diginews article. You can put a box of microfilm in storage for 40 years and have it come out readable with no further investment. But if you did the same thing with WordStar disks even 15 years ago, you are out of luck today.

Any preservation initiative for government information must take the CHRONIC lack of funding resources of federal information agencies. That's why we at FGI believe in a distributed electronic future and not the mostly centralized model currently favored by the government. It's also why many in the documents community, myself included believe in a multiformat model (i.e. print, electronic, microfilm) as well. Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

Archives

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM