Dorothy Day and FOIA

How can I connect Dorothy Day, founder of the Catholic Worker movement with the Freedom of Information Act? Because Dorothy Day had an FBI file! While her 581 page file is not available on the FBI FOIA Electronic Reading Room site, you are welcome to review the documents at the FBI's physical FOIA reading room at: 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC; hours, 8:30 am to 2:30 pm. You are required to make appointments 48 hours in advance of arriving; please call 202-324-8057 to make your appointment. If you'd rather not make the trip to DC, try reading the Catholic Worker article A Look Back at the Bureau by Robert Ellsberg in the March/April 2006 issue, which reviews the file of the Catholic Worker and Dorothy Day's file from the time the Catholic Worker first attracted Bureau attention in 1948 through its activities in the Vietnam War. This decades-long investigation of a completely nonviolent organization came to light because Ellsberg and Day used FOIA back in the late 1970s. This serves as an example of how government openness can be used to try and press for greater accountability. I say try because some Catholic Worker houses are still under investigation. It makes the final part of the article ring true today even though it was originally written in 1979:

Our own file simply contributes a small part to a portrait of the Bureau already available: an organization caught in the web of its own delusions, no longer capable of distinguishing personal criticism from treason; a secret police force, answerable to no one, monitoring the beliefs and associations of American citizens, rating them by some private standard as to "dangerousness," making secret threats on the basis of people's "unconscious" motivations, attempting to inhibit people from free thinking and free speaking. To use a Bureau term, it was dangerous. It was also foolish.
At least we still have FOIA to continue to highlight these kinds of abuses. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

FDSys Blog Lives! Now how about some content?

A few days ago, I wrote the obituary of the FDSys Blog. The rumors I started of its death were premature. June 1st they posted an item providing an update of their Request for Proposal. I still think that six months without a blog entry is inappropriate for an active blog. The new technologies office could be using this blog to educate the documents community. For example, they could do a series on the FDsys Requirements Document, going through it section by section and trying to render it into plain English for us. Or they could talk about how they are working with agencies to get content into FDSys, or how the push mechanism might work. If they could just find something to post once a week or even once a month, the FDSys Blog could be a great educational tool. If they're going to stick to erratic postings separated by months, then the FDSys folks would be better off just having a "What's New" section on their main site. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Digital Preservation and the Open Web

Computers in Libraries recently posted presentation slides and handouts from the 2006 Computers in Libraries conference. While I thought several presentations above would be of interest to FGI readers, I think that Digital Preservation & the Open Web should be read by all documents librarians and Government Printing Office (GPO) staff. This presentation is a report on the web at risk project and focuses on the role that libraries have to play in identifying and preserving important web content that the commercial sector might not have an interest in mainitaining for us. Looking through the project partners, I was interested in seeing eight FDLP (depository) libraries from the UC system on the list. I hope that someone from one of those libraries can write in with what their involvement is. Decentralization is beautiful. Thanks to the "Web at Risk" project for helping to make it happen. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Pt. 6: Nonlawyer’s journey through Title 44: Requirements of depository libraries

This post, all earlier postings in this series, and my "not a lawyer" disclaimer can be found at http://freegovinfo.info/title44 or through our library under Nonlawyer's Journey through Title 44. In my last Title 44 installment, I covered 44 USC 1905. Today I vault over several sections relating to types of depository libraries to land on 44 USC 1909, Sec. 1909. Requirements of depository libraries; reports on conditions; investigations; termination; replacement. I don't believe the sections I skipped are central to the Depository Library Program, but if you disagree, explain why in the comments or by e-mail to dnlcornwall AT alaska.net. Back to section 1909. This is the section of the depository law that lays out the basic expectations of depository libraries. This is the minimum that members of the public should expect from depository libraries. If these expectations aren't met, then there are ways to kick libraries out of the program. See more analysis after reading through 44 USC 1909:

ITLE 44--PUBLIC PRINTING AND DOCUMENTS CHAPTER 19--DEPOSITORY LIBRARY PROGRAM Sec. 1909. Requirements of depository libraries; reports on conditions; investigations; termination; replacement Only a library able to provide custody and service for depository materials and located in an area where it can best serve the public need, and within an area not already adequately served by existing depository libraries may be designated by Senators, Representatives, the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, the Commissioner of the District of Columbia,\1\ or the Governors of Guam, American Samoa, or the Virgin Islands as a depository of Government publications. The designated depository libraries shall report to the Superintendent of Documents at least every two years concerning their condition. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Transfer of Functions note below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Superintendent of Documents shall make firsthand investigation of conditions for which need is indicated and include the results of investigations in his annual report. When he ascertains that the number of books in a depository library is below ten thousand, other than Government publications, or it has ceased to be maintained so as to be accessible to the public, or that the Government publications which have been furnished the library have not been properly maintained, he shall delete the library from the list of depository libraries if the library fails to correct the unsatisfactory conditions within six months. The Representative or the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico in whose area the library is located or the Senator who made the designation, or a successor of the Senator, and, in the case of a library in the District of Columbia, the Commissioner of the District of Columbia, and, in the case of a library in Guam, American Samoa, or the Virgin Islands, the Governor, shall be notified and shall then be authorized to designate another library within the area served by him, which shall meet the conditions herein required, but which may not be in excess of the number of depository libraries authorized by laws within the State, district, territory, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, as the case may be. (Pub. L. 90-620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1285.) Historical and Revision Notes Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., Sec. 86 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, Sec. 70, 28 Stat. 612; Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87-579, Sec. 6, 76 Stat. 354). Transfer of Functions Office of Commissioner of District of Columbia, as established under Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1967, eff. Nov. 3, 1967 (in part), 32 F.R. 11669, 81 Stat. 948, abolished as of noon Jan. 2, 1975, by Pub. L. 93-198, title VII, Sec. 711, Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 818, and replaced by office of Mayor of District of Columbia by section 421 of Pub. L. 93-198. Section Referred to in Other Sections This section is referred to in section 1916 of this title.
Section 1909 places the following requirements on Federal Depository Libraries:
  • Must be able to provide custody for depository materials.
  • Must be able to provide service for depository materials.
  • Must make a biennial report on their condition to the Government Printing Office (GPO).
  • Must contain at least 10,000 books in their non-depository collections.
  • Must be open to the public.
  • Government publications which have been furnished to the library must be properly maintained
Looking at the law and the list above, it seems legally plain to this nonlawyer librarian that the very idea of "an all-electronic depository" where there is no custody of digital files is prohibited by Title 44. You cannot have a "depository library" if the library is not providing custody to at least some of the materials offered through Federal Depository Library Program. By the same token, a library that had custody of materials but did not either offer some kind of access to them or process (catalog, etc) them would also be in violation of Title 44. Other ways that a library could get into trouble would be not being open to the public. For example, a college library that was also a depository could not get away with only allowing the university community access to the college. If someone off the street can't get into the collection, it's not open to the public and therefore not compliant. However, GPO recognizes the security needs of depository libraries and does allow libraries to require identification to entry the library holding the depository collection. Failing in its Title 44 responsibilities can put a depository library on a six-month probation period. If the problems are not fixed, the library can have its designation as a depository pulled. This would require the library to return all of the federal materials it has received through the program. Depository materials cannot be retained by the library because although libraries have custody of the material, the ownership remains with the federal government. So how can GPO tell whether a library is meeting its depository requirements? The main way is through the biennial survey that GPO has libraries fills out every two years. Additionally, at least in law is the depository inspector program. This program is authorized by the part of Section 1909 that says "The Superintendent of Documents shall make firsthand investigation of conditions for which need is indicated and include the results of investigations in his annual report." In truth though, this program has been moribund for years. Partly because the inspection process, though authorized by law, was too adversarial and encouraged libraries to hide their flaws. Mostly, it's fallen flat because GPO is chronically underfunded and didn't have the money to both inspect libraries and carry out their other Congressionally mandated activities. Since at least 2004, GPO has been trying the laudable experiment of hiring field-based consultants to replace depository inspectors. To date, funding has not been available for this program. If this has changed, I'd love to hear from someone. That's all I can find to say about Section 1909. Section 1910 covers the procedures for replacing depository libraries, which doesn't interest me because libraries are replaced so rarely. So next time we will look at Sec. 1911. Free use of Government publications in depositories. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

June BOTM is Jessamyn West

Our guest blogger for June is Jessamyn West of librarian.net fame (find out more on her bio). I'm sure she'll put the 'rarin into our discussions about access to government information and digital information in general. Take it away Jessamyn. The center column is yours! Many thanks to Cindi Wolff for being our guest for May and for posting a wealth of info on Open Access! Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Archives

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM