Signing Statement Page Update

The President decided to ignore some reporting requirements in a Palestinian Authority related bill, and we've updated our Presidential Signing Statements page to tell you how. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

20061221 – No to information on who is aiding Palestian Authority

On December 21, 2006, President Bush signed S. 2370, the "Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006" , but made a statement indicating he intends to ignore reporting requirements:

The executive branch shall construe section 3(b) of the Act, which relates to access to certain information by a legislative agent, and section 11 of the Act, which relates to a report on certain assistance by foreign countries, international organizations, or multilateral development banks, in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to withhold information that could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties.
According to the final version of the bill on Congress' Thomas web site, here are the "offending sections" in the President's view: Section 3(b):
`(b) Exceptions- Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the following: `(1) ASSISTANCE TO MEET BASIC HUMAN NEEDS- Assistance to meet food, water, medicine, health, or sanitation needs, or other assistance to meet basic human needs. `(2) ASSISTANCE TO PROMOTE DEMOCRACY- Assistance to promote democracy, human rights, freedom of the press, non-violence, reconciliation, and peaceful coexistence, provided that such assistance does not directly benefit Hamas or any other foreign terrorist organization. `(3) ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE PALESTINIAN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL- Assistance, other than funding of salaries or salary supplements, to individual members of the Palestinian Legislative Council who the President determines are not members of Hamas or any other foreign terrorist organization, for the purposes of facilitating the attendance of such members in programs for the development of institutions of democratic governance, including enhancing the transparent and accountable operations of such institutions, and providing support for the Middle East peace process. `(4) OTHER TYPES OF ASSISTANCE- Any other type of assistance if the President-- `(A) determines that the provision of such assistance is in the national security interest of the United States; and `(B) not less than 30 days prior to the obligation of amounts for the provision of such assistance-- `(i) consults with the appropriate congressional committees regarding the specific programs, projects, and activities to be carried out using such assistance; and `(ii) submits to the appropriate congressional committees a written memorandum that contains the determination of the President under subparagraph (A).
Section 11:
SEC. 11. REPORTING REQUIREMENT. Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that-- (1) describes the steps that have been taken by the United States Government to ensure that other countries and international organizations, including multilateral development banks, do not provide direct assistance to the Palestinian Authority for any period for which a certification described in section 620K(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as added by section 2(b)(2) of this Act) is not in effect with respect to the Palestinian Authority; and (2) identifies any countries and international organizations, including multilateral development banks, that are providing direct assistance to the Palestinian Authority during such a period, and describes the nature and amount of such assistance.
FGI leaves it to others to interpret section 3(b) above, but in denying the validity of Section 11, the President appears to be saying that he considers mere reporting of aid to the Palestinians by other nations and groups to be harmful to the national interest. Does this mean that the Administration is aware of non-humanitarian aid to the Hamas-led government, but doesn't want to make that public? If so, it must be coming from our "allies" in the Mideast, since presumably Iranian or Syrian Aid would be splashed across the front pages of papers. These are the kinds of questions we are left with by a secretive administration. How many of these signing statement will it take to convince Congress that any "compromise" legislation based on reporting requirements in exchange for new powers or resources is doomed to failure? Will this pattern of allowing the administration to pick and choose from the laws it obeys continue with the new Congressional majority? FGI hopes so. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

New Videos and Tutorials

This week we've updated our Audio and Videos page to include three new videos and a link to an University of Minnesota tutorial on creating streaming media. The latest video posted is one of mine and it highlights Army resources in depository libraries: Remember, this registration page is for YOUR videos and audio spots as well. If you are creating govdocs promotional materials, PSAs, etc that others can use, let us know. Either post the link to comments on the videos page, or send the link to admin AT freegovinfo.info. We're aiming to update the page once a week on weekends, and it would be great to include links to your govdoc related content. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Mass Digitization of Books

Given the Government Printing Office's intention to "digitize a complete legacy collection of tangible U.S. Government publications" (GPO's Digitization and Preservation Initiatives) and the mass digitization of books that the Google Books Library Project and the Open Content Alliance and others are doing, this is a good time to read Karen Coyle's excellent overview of mass digitization.

Coyle notes that "Google has clearly stated that their book project is solely aimed at providing a searchable index to the books on library shelves. They are quite careful not to promise an online reading experience...." and says that "we have little idea how the digitized books will be used." She then raises some important questions:

...who does this digitized library serve? How does it serve users? How will the system respond when there are ten million books in a database and a user enters the query “civil war”? ...Will some users read these books online in spite of the relative inconvenience of their formats and the computer screen's technology? Will it be possible to use the digitized pages to produce something more e-book like?

In a related article, (An ATM for books, By Emily Maltby, FORTUNE Small Business Magazine, December 14 2006) Maltby describes Espresso - a $50,000 vending machine that is "nearly consumer-ready" that will debut in ten to 25 libraries and bookstores in 2007. "The machine can print, align, mill, glue and bind two books simultaneously in less than seven minutes." All this sounds very similar to the Internet Archive Bookmobile.

Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Remix: Iraq Study Group Report

Lapham's Quarterly and the Institute for the Future of the Book "present a new form of discussion and critique -- an annotated edition of the ISG Report on a website programmed to that specific purpose, evolving over the course of the next three weeks into a collaborative illumination of an otherwise black hole."

Iraq Study Group Report, With a running conversation in the margins...
We've opened up the report to a quorum of informed sources both foreign and domestic, asking them for notes, commentaries and corrections at any point in the proceedings that incites them to further clarification or forthright translation into plain English. The respondents are free to address any one of the seventy-nine recommendations, to doubt an assertion or deconstruct a paragraph, to bring to bear an historical perspective on an opaque sentence or a clichéd chapter heading, to lend the ballast of their collective marginalia to the hot air balloon of a text sorely in need of tethering to the ground of common sense and geopolitical reality. —Lewis Lapham

Also see: live, on the web, it's the iraq study group report! if:book (12.21.2006)

Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Archives

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM