Congressional Committees Project

Note: News of this project was originally posted on the govdoc-l list. The Congressional Committees Project is a wiki who's main goal is to "facilitate participatory democracy by encouraging an informed citizenry through the advocacy of legislative transparency and the gathering of legislative information." Contributors are asked to organize information on committees, and to share resources and information. Although this is hosted on the wiki section of dailykos, a democratically partisan blog, the project is deliberately *non-partisan* and "does not imply the endorsement of daily kos or its creators." I'm adding this to our list of remixes. This would be a very valuable project for govt documents librarians to get involved in. After all, who better than docs librarians to know about the workings of the US government and to share that information! To get the ball rolling, I just edited the section on the House Committee on Science, noting the name change because of Deb Liptak's post earlier today about that news!! [Thanks to Patrice McDermott, director of Open the Government for originally posting to the list!] Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

House Committee on Science and Technology

The Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives released the following statement On January 4, Rep. Bart Gordon (TN-06) assumed the Chairmanship of the House Committee on Science and Technology for the 110th Congress. House Rules Package (H.Res. 6) was passed January 4, 2007 and changes the name of the Committee on Science to the Committee on Science and Technology to more accurately reflect its broad jurisdiction in the areas of science, research and technology. In an April 28, 2005 investigation on Integrity and Science Rep. Gordon states that Scientific progress occurs when we foster the open exchange of ideas and information. On January 2, 2007 Ed Vawter of QD Information posted a blog entry Political Interferrence in US Science voicing concerns within the scientific community that government policy is possibly forced scientists into making their research results fit the policy. One of my ongoing concerns is the fact that the U. S. Government does not have an executive office that deals primarily in science. Many foreign governments have a Ministry of Science specifically devoted to scientific issues. We have executive departments for agriculture, commerce, defense, education, energy, health, homeland security, housing, justice, labor, state, interior, treasury, transportation, and veteran affairs. Science seems to be divided among the fifteen executive branches of the government. The closest the U. S. has to an Executive Department of Science is the independent agency, the National Science Foundation. Science.gov is also a gateway to authoritative selected science information provided by U.S. Government agencies including research and development. Hopefully the re-establishment and new leadership of the Committee on Science and Technology will keep science and technology honest and unbiased. Thanks to Sabrina I. Pacifici at beSpacific for the lead about the newly formed Committee on Science and Technology. Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

Last Time Gov’t Opened First Class Mail

Thanks to vigorous Congressional oversight in the 1970s and the distribution of reports to many outlets, including Federal Depository Libraries, we know what happened the last time the Intelligence Community opened mail without warrants (emphasis mine):

DOMESTIC CIA AND FBI MAIL OPENING PROGRAMS PART I: SUMMARY AND PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS Between 1940 and 1973, two agencies of the federal government -- the CIA and the FBI -- covertly and illegally opened and photographed first class letter mail within the United States. These agencies conducted a total of twelve mail opening programs for lengths of time varying from three weeks to twenty-six years. In a single program alone, more than 215,000 communications were intercepted, opened, and photographed; the photographic copies of these letters, some dated as early as 1955, were indexed, filed, and are retained even today. Information from this and other mail opening programs -- "sanitized" to disguise its true source -- was disseminated within the federal establishment to other members of the intelligence community, the Attorney General, and to the President of the United States. The stated objective of the CIA programs was the collection of foreign intelligence and counterintelligence information; that of the FBI programs was the collection of counterespionage information. In terms of their respective purposes, seven of the twelve mail opening programs were considered to have been successful by Agency and Bureau officials. One CIA project and three of the FBI programs concededly failed to obtain any significant relevant information. Another CIA operation -- clearly the most massive of all the programs in terms of numbers of letters opened -- was believed to have been of value to the Agency by some officials, but was criticized by many others as having produced only minimally useful foreign intelligence. Despite two unfavorable internal reviews, this program nonetheless continued unabated for twenty years. While all of these programs responded to the felt intelligence needs of the CIA and the FBI during the "cold war" of the 1950's and early 1960's, once in place they could be -- and sometimes were -- directed against the citizens of this country for the collection of essentially domestic intelligence. In the 1960's and early 1970's, large numbers of American dissidents, including those who challenged the condition of racial minorities and those who opposed the war in Vietnam, were specifically targeted for mail opening by both agencies. In one program, selection of mail on the basis of "personal taste" by agents untrained in foreign intelligence objectives resulted in the interception and opening of the mail of Senators, Congressmen, journalists, businessmen, and even a Presidential candidate.
For an official printed version of the report, see: Final report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate : together with additional, supplemental, and separate views. by United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.; Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. (1976) We don't need to see this movie again. Tell your Congressperson and the White House. Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

Deb Liptak, BOTM for January, 2007

Deborah A. Liptak MLIS, is the owner of info2go, which specializes in locating and delivering government documents, public records and primary research beyond what is available on Google Books, WorldCat or FirstSearch. Deb received a MLIS from the University of Oklahoma 1988. Deb publishes Need to Know by info2go, a monthly newsletter and RSS feed. She is also an on call librarian at Tarrant County Community College in Texas. In a former life, Deb was a Communications-Electronics Officer in the United States Air Force, and recently wrote a magazine article on Information Warfare, which is scheduled for publication later this spring. Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

20061220 – President says he can open mail without a warrant

On December 20, 2006, President Bush signed H.R. 6407 (Public Law No. 109-435), the "Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act" but in his signing statement (President's Statement on H.R. 6407, the "Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act") he "declared his right to open mail under emergency conditions, contrary to existing law and contradicting the bill he had just signed, according to experts who have reviewed it" according to an article in the New York Daily News and reprinted in the Seattle Times:

The opening of mail isn't the only qualification in the signing statement. There are a total of six paragraphs stating various qualifications to the law in "executive branch shall construe" statements.

Continue reading →

Continue Reading →

Archives

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM