OpenHouse Op-Ed about CRS reports
As part of the OpenHouse Project, there is a new Op-Ed in The Hill. Harris and Stoller make the point that the excuses being used to keep CRS reports from being made freely available to the public are just not valid. This includes the complaint "that making CRS reports available to the public could change the way they use the service. What undercuts this argument is that CRS reports are already widely available through commercial channels."
- Inexplicable anomaly, By Leslie Harris and Matt Stoller, The Hill, May 15, 2007.
Frankly, it's difficult to believe that Congress thinks it can control whether CRS reports are made available to the public over the Internet. A decade ago, CRS was among a dwindling handful of government entities that had yet to embrace the democratizing power of the Web. Now, in 2007, CRS's practices are an inexplicable anomaly that grows more glaring with each passing year. ...Companies like Penny Hill Press and LexisNexis manage to obtain the reports and provide copies for a fee. As a result, well-heeled lobbyists can search CRS reports readily, while ordinary Americans cannot. To fix this inequity, all Congress has to do is update an archaic policy that never made much sense, and now seems even sillier.Continue reading
FGI Podcast Launches! Listen Now!
Based in part on user feedback and in part on our own drive to experiment, Free Government Information has started it's very own podcast. While we acknowledge we have more to learn about audio engineering, we think you will find it worth your time. Our first podcast is just under 20 minutes and has the following features:
- Segment 1: What is Free Government Information?
- Segment 2: Government Information in the News
- Segment 3: Government Podcast Sample - This Week at NASA
- Segment 4: Outro music - Rise by The Rev. Din from the Internet Archive Open Source Audio Collection
Early CLOCKSS Lessons
Reprinted with permission from the LOCKSS Alliance mailing list: ------------------- Dear Colleagues, The CLOCKSS (Controlled LOCKSS) Board would like to take this opportunity to apprise you of our progress, to share early lessons, and to encourage you to participate in the process of building this shared resource. The CLOCKSS participants (major academic publishers, research libraries, and the Stanford University team) are building a community-governed, stable, digital archive for published scholarly content. CLOCKSS access is unbundled from fees: after a “trigger†event (when a publisher is no longer able to provide electronic access to some or all of its archived material), content will be freely available to all. Many libraries have moved away from building and preserving collections, and there is increasing interest in community stewardship and preservation of, and guaranteed long-term access to, scholarly publications. Since its inception early in 2006, the CLOCKSS members made significant strides towards the effective management of archived materials, and learned some important lessons. We are also extremely proud to have been awarded the ALA ALCTS 2007 Outstanding Collaboration Citation, which will be formally presented at ALA’s annual meeting in Washington in June. To find out more about our early lessons and progress, go to www.clockss.org and click on the link “CLOCKSS Lessons.†As always, we welcome comments and suggestions. Please let us hear from you. Sincerely, Vicky Reich vreich@stanford.edu -------------------- I took Vicky's advice and checked out some of the CLOCKSS lessons. While I think you should read the entire five page documents, here are some good quotes that I think are worthwhile to documents librarians. Just think of "federal government" whenever you see the word "publisher":
The most important, and first, lesson learned by CLOCKSS participants was that commercial, university press, and society publishers; and librarians can collaborate effectively and thrive by working as equals to build a community-governed archive. The CLOCKSS Board meets formally twice each month by phone and twice a year in person. The Board establishes policies and implements procedures for wide range of social, business, content, and technical issues.---------
The archived content is a valuable asset, into which scholars, librarians, and publishers have made considerable long-term investments; it must be protected from a wide variety of possible disruptions whether deliberate or accidental. The CLOCKSS archive network is made up of widely distributed host libraries spanning geographic, political and legal boundaries, and this global network, under the stewardship of those who’ve invested so heavily in it, will protect these important assets for future generations of scholars.------------
In February 2007, the CLOCKSS team first successfully demonstrated the process that would follow a trigger event (retrieving preserved presentation content from the network of CLOCKSS boxes, transferring it to a publishing platform, and making it available to readers).-------------
Over the long term, the CLOCKSS Board intends to raise a capital fund to pay for most (if not all) of the archive’s ongoing expenses. Digital preservation requires continuous processes; when active preservation ceases, materials are lost. By building a capital fund and becoming selfsustaining, CLOCKSS will ensure that the preservation processes continue over time, regardless of the availability of outside sources of revenue (a circumstance with which libraries are wellfamiliar – witness the recent rescission of Library of Congress NDIIPP funding to help finance other American government priorities).---------------- No one agency can or should preserve government information all on it's own. There is another way. Continue reading
Does it still cost libraries $4 bucks for every GPO dollar?
One of the ways we FGI volunteers try to keep up with the government information news is through the use of Google Alerts. Sometimes these "new alerts" dredge up old information that is still of interest. For example, today's alert looking for instances of "Free Government Information", brought out this interesting item from the new ERIC database: ERIC #: EJ491407 Title: Costing Out a Depository Library: What Free Government Information? Authors: Dugan, Robert E.; Dodsworth, Ellen M. Source: Government Information Quarterly, v11 n3 p261-84 1994 Back in 1994, the authors came to this somewhat startling conclusion in their abstract:
In 1993, the Georgetown University library spent over four dollars to support its depository program for every dollar the Government Printing Office spent to distribute the information. Methods used to calculate costs, cost-sharing issues, and suggested action are discussed. Appendixes include a summary of the cost-compilation model and a selective bibliography. (Contains 30 references.) (KRN)Anyone out know if this is still true? Although printed output of government is down drastically, people still need to discover, describe and provide access to government information resources. A quick browse of the first two screens of ERIC documents related to Depository Libraries took me back to 2001 without a similar study. Please let us know about more recent studies in the comments section. Continue reading
Gary Price on Library Geeks podcast
Gary Price, our March blogger of the month was just interviewed on Daniel Chudnov's great new library geek podcast. It's great to hear Gary, to put a voice to a blogger so to speak. and Congratulations Gary on your recent marriage!! Continue reading