Summer at FGI
We haven't been posting a lot here on FGI this summer, but it is not for lack of news. Most of us at FGI have just been on the road a lot: going to ALA, doing projects, and visiting family. As we start settling back in we'll start posting more frequently again and catching up with developments in government information. Continue reading
Tell Google Book Search to protect reader privacy
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), those defenders of online free speech, privacy, innovation, and consumer rights, have begun an action to tell Google to protect reader privacy. Please sign the petition and send a clear message to Google CEO Eric Schmidt to protect reader privacy.
You shouldn't be forced to pay for digital books with your privacy. Tell Google it needs to develop a robust privacy policy that gives you at least as much privacy in books online as you have in your neighborhood library or bookstore. Google must:And since Google is clearly angling itself as a "library" -- even publishing a "Google librarian newsletter"! -- I would ask all who submit an EFF petition to include the American Library Association's (ALA) Library Bill of Rights and a link to the ALA Intellectual Freedom Manual, which states:
- Protect your reading records from government and third party fishing expeditions by responding only to properly-issued warrants and court orders, and by letting you know if someone has demanded access to information Google has collected about you.
- Make sure that you can still browse and read anonymously by not forcing you to register or give personal information and by deleting any logging information for all services after a maximum of 30 days.
- Separate data related to Google Book Search from any other information the company collects about you, unless you give it express permission.
- Give you the ability to edit and delete any information collected about you, transfer books from one account to another without tracking, and hide your "bookshelves" or other reading lists from others with access to your computer.
- Keep Google Book Search information private from third parties like credit card processors, book publishers, and advertisers.
Privacy is essential to the exercise of free speech, free thought, and free association. The courts have established a First Amendment right to receive information in a publicly funded library. Further, the courts have upheld the right to privacy based on the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution. Many states provide guarantees of privacy in their constitutions and statute law. Numerous decisions in case law have defined and extended rights to privacy. In a library (physical or virtual), the right to privacy is the right to open inquiry without having the subject of one’s interest examined or scrutinized by others. Confidentiality exists when a library is in possession of personally identifiable information about users and keeps that information private on their behalf. Protecting user privacy and confidentiality has long been an integral part of the mission of libraries. The ALA has affirmed a right to privacy since 1939. Existing ALA policies affirm that confidentiality is crucial to freedom of inquiry. Rights to privacy and confidentiality also are implicit in the Library Bill of Rights’ guarantee of free access to library resources for all users.Continue reading
--Privacy: an interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights
Depository Concerns in Michigan
This e-mail from govdoc-l is being reposted with the permission of Doug Way.
Subject: Depository Concerns in Michigan From: Doug Way Reply-To: Discussion of Government Document Issues Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:23:12 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain Parts/Attachments: Parts/Attachments Hello everyone, On behalf of the Government Documents Roundtable of Michigan I wanted to make a posting to inform you of an executive order recently made by Gov. Granholm. This order calls for, among other things, the elimination of the Department of History, Arts and Libraries and for the elimination or transfer of the library's Federal Depository collection. As the state's regional library, this obviously has dramatic implications for the state's depository community and for public access to government information. For the complete executive order, please see: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/gov/EO36_285881_7.pdf. For a thorough summary of the executive order and the Michigan Library Association's position (as of last week), please GODORT of MI's Red Tape blog, which is maintained by Jon Harrison (http://blogpublic.lib.msu.edu/index.php/2009/07/14/governor-granholm-issues-executive-order?blog=5). Jon has been posting different details as they emerge, so if you are interested in following this situation I would encourage you to read the Red Tape blog (http://blogpublic.lib.msu.edu/index.php?blog=5). Needless to say this is a difficult and challenging time for the library community in Michigan. The governor's executive order and other proposals floating around Lansing impact not only the depository program, but a wide range of library services that the residents of the state take advantage of on a daily basis. Unfortunately, just at the time when the residents of our state need libraries the most they are the ones who will suffer the most as they lose access to information (government and otherwise). Regards, Doug Way President, GODORT of MII'd like to take note of the fact that Governor Granholm is a Democrat. It's important to remember that friends and adversaries of libraries come from across the political spectrum. You can never class one party or group of people as wholly bad and another party/group as wholly good. We at FGI would welcome discussion of any aspect of the closure/reassignment of the Library of Michigan in this space. A wound to one library is a wound to all. Continue reading
What features do you want for your catalog of govt data?
Data is definitely getting sexy. Jonathan Gray of the Open Knowledge Foundation asks "What features should be included in a catalogue of open government data?" and points to a few other data repositories being built on the state and country level (like my own city of SF's CivicDB!). He also mentions the Sunlight Foundation's plan to build on and expand data.gov with a national data catalog that I had meant to write about a couple of weeks ago (go Sunlight!). So I'm putting this question to you, FGI's faithful readers. I'm sure you'll have a thing or three to add to the list of requirements for open data catalogs.
Here are a few suggestions for those building catalogues for (open) government data based on our experience developing CKAN:[originally tweeted by @EllnMllr. Go ahead and follow her!] Continue reading
- Make the catalogue itself open!
- Let others download the catalogue data in bulk (not just via an API)
- Include information on how to get the data, and how it can be used
- Make it versioned!
NARA’s draft 2009 strategic plan
The National Archives (NARA) has just released a draft of their 2009 strategic plan entitled, Preserving the Past to Protect the Future. It details NARA's goals for the next 10 years and offers an interesting window into the agency's focus. They are asking for public feedback by August 5, 2009 via e-mail (vision@nara.gov) or by fax (301) 837-0319. Especially read the section, "how will we know we have succeeded." Some of the benchmarks for success are achievable and admirable (i.e., "Within 30 days of the end of an administration, 100 percent of Presidential and Vice Presidential materials have been moved to NARA locations or NARA-approved facilities." and "By 2014, 100 percent of NARA records center holdings are stored in appropriate space.") but it's glaring that the first item of "success" is that "by 2016, 50 percent of agencies achieve passing scores for compliance with Federal records management policy." That seems like an extremely low benchmark to this non-archivist. Shouldn't ALL agencies already be compliant?
[Thanks to John Wonderlich and the Open House Project for pointing this one out!] Continue reading...And the increasing demand by users for more online access to records has driven us to prioritize the processing of a backlog of records and to focus on increasing our digitization efforts. Our holdings in all media—paper, electronic, film, and so on—are constantly growing as the proliferation of Government records continues. At the same time, the public demand for access is increasing. NARA has a significant backlog of unprocessed holdings that are therefore not yet readily available to the public. New records are arriving faster than they can be processed. Clearly, we must refocus attention and resources on making as many records as possible accessible to the public. While we put great effort into readying records for public use, the expectation of easy online access to our holdings continues to grow. The American public expects information to be delivered almost instantly to their desktop with more and more information available via the Internet. However, we cannot provide online access to all our holdings in the next decade—the task is simply too big. Our focus must be on making our most requested holdings available online, and on providing researchers with online tools to help them in their work. Because of work done every day in NARA facilities across the nation, the public can examine the records that document the actions of Government officials, the entitlements of individuals, the events that make up American history, and in some instances, how those events have affected the rest of the world. With new social media applications (Web 2.0), we have the opportunity to reach the public with tools they already use. These tools allow us to operate more transparently and to interact with our users in new, more informal ways. Our primary response to the challenge of authentically preserving electronic records and providing access to these records in the future is the Electronic Records Archives (ERA). ERA will provide a comprehensive, systematic, and dynamic means of preserving and providing continuing access to authentic electronic records over time. When fully deployed, ERA will give us the means to preserve, process, and provide continuing access to Federal Government electronic records of archival value. Yet, at the same time, we must explore ways to provide economical storage and retrieval services for electronic records that remain under the legal control of the originating agencies. We must also continue to adapt our internal business processes and staff expertise to effectively use the ERA system and to ensure that it evolves over time to fit tomorrow’s technology. The Internet has introduced countless researchers to the holdings of the National Archives. This thirst for online access to information is exciting, as it brings more and more people to our virtual doors, yet the task of building an “archives without walls” is daunting. Implicit in this task is the ability for archivists and the public to virtually interact. Our strategies in this area will focus on developing dynamic partnerships to digitize and deliver our most popular holdings and create interactive tools to help researchers find the information they seek. By putting our country’s records literally at the public’s fingertips, we will be able to share our rich resources with more people than ever before.
- Goal 1: Our Nation’s Record Keeper
- Goal 2: Preserve and Process
- Goal 3: Electronic Records
- Goal 4: Access
- Goal 5: Civic Literacy
- Goal 6: Infrastructure