CRS report on ACTA

CRS Report Withheld By USTR Confirms That ACTA Language Is Quite Questionable, by Mike Masnick, TechDirt, April 26, 2011.

We're happy to announce that we've been able to get our hands on the -- until now -- secret Congressional Research Service analysis of ACTA.... [I]t shows that the language used by the USTR in ACTA has lots of weasel words that let them claim it doesn't impact US law, but the interpretations of the language could very much impact US law. "...The Committee concludes that Congress intended to retain control over this document and that it is not an agency record subject to FOIA."
"Potential Implications For Federal Law Raised By The October 2010 Draft Of The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement - ACTA" CRS Memorandum To Honorable Ron Wyden From Brian T. Yeh, Legislative Attorney, American Law Division, 7-5182 October 29, 2010 7-5700 Redacted. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Research: Why not just google it?

A new research paper that evaluated the information literacy skills of first-year dental students reports:

Nearly half of students missed one or more question components that required finding an evidence-based citation. Analysis of the survey revealed a significantly higher percentage of students who provided incorrect responses reported using Google as their preferred online search method. In contrast, a significantly higher percentage of students who reported using PubMed were able to provide correct responses. Following a one-hour intervention by a health science librarian, virtually all students were able to find and retrieve evidence-based materials for subsequent coursework.
Kingsley, Karl, Gillian Galbraith, Matthew Herring, Eva Stowers, Tanis Stewart, and Karla Kingsley, Why Not Just Google It? An Assessment of Information Literacy Skills in a Biomedical Science Curriculum., BMC Medical Education, 11 (2011), 17 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-17. Hat tip to InfoDocket! Continue reading

Continue Reading →

NARA Posts Documents on Guatemalan Syphilis Experiments

From UNREDACTED (Decades Later, NARA Posts Documents on Guatemalan Syphilis Experiments, by Kate Doyle, April 25, 2011):

Between 1946 and 1948, U.S. public health researchers infected hundreds of Guatemalan prisoners, soldiers and mentally ill patients with syphilis and gonorrhea, without their knowledge or consent, in order to test the effectiveness of penicillin. The experiments were carried out in Guatemala under the cloak of confidentiality, and the results were never published in the United States. But after a scholar discovered archives chronicling the program at the University of Pittsburgh and published her findings last year, the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) took custody of the documents and on March 29 made them publicly available.
From the NARA press release:
The National Archives at Atlanta announced that on March 29, 2011, it will release online the papers of Dr. John C. Cutler. Dr. Cutler, a former employee of the U.S. Public Health Service, 1942-1967, was involved in research on Guatemalan soldiers, prisoners, and mental health patients who were exposed to the syphilis bacteria. The collection is available online [http://www.archives.gov/research/health/cdc-cutler-records] and at the National Archives at Atlanta, located at 5780 Jonesboro Road, Morrow, Georgia, 30260.
Continue reading

Continue Reading →

New House.gov site

A preview of the new House.gov site is now available:

Gary has posted a useful summary overview at infodocket. Sunlight Labs has a more in depth post here. Continue reading

Continue Reading →

New Link Rot Report

For libraries that rely on pointing to URLs rather than preserving information in their own digital libraries, the new report from the Chesapeake Project provides sobering, factual data on the reliability of that strategy. In an examination of "link rot" the project found that 30.4% of URLs examined no longer provide access to their original information. This study is particularly relevant to government information specialists because more than 90% of their sample URLs were from state governments (state.[state code].us), organizations (.org), and government (.gov) the top-level domains. The Chesapeake Project Legal Information Archive, which harvests and preserves relevant digital legal information from the web, has been producing reports on "link rot" for several years. They define link rot as "a URL that no longer provides direct access to files matching the content originally harvested from the URL and currently preserved in the Chesapeake Group's digital archive." Their new report is now available:

In one interesting finding, the report says that the rate of loss of information slowed in the last year: "Whereas the prevalence of link rot among URLs in the sample nearly doubled every year during the first three years of the study, it slowed significantly in the fourth year." The report makes clear that although 30.4 percent, or nearly one-third, of the archived titles have disappeared from their original URLs since the beginning of the program in 2007, only 2.5 percent of URLs were lost to link rot within the past year. Their data show that cumulative link rot frequency for .gov files was 10% in 2008, 13% in 2009, 25% in 2010, and 31% in 2011. There was an interesting development in that some state-level URLs that were inaccessible in 2010 were once again accessible when re-checked for the 2011 analysis. The cumulative link rot frequency for state level URLs was still almost as high as for the federal URLs: 10.8% in 2008, 15.8% in 2009, 32.1% in 2010, and 30.4% in 2011. Even with that slight improvement at the state level, the overall cumulative link rot percentage rose in 2011 (30.4%) over 2010 (27.9%). Another way of looking at this is that of the documents the Chesapeake Project has preserved, only 69.6% were still available at their original URL as of the 2011 study. In an earlier study, the authors qualified their findings, noting that the findings are "not meant to be broadly applicable or to provide a representation of link rot throughout the universe of web resources" but only reports on those items in the Chesapeake Project archive. The studies do provide "insight into the vulnerability of law- and policy-related web resources selected by experienced law librarians from seemingly stable open-access web sites hosted by reputable organizations and state and federal governments." Significantly, "All of the Web resources described in this report that have disappeared from their original locations on the Web remain accessible via permanent archive URLs here at legalinfoarchive.org, thanks to the Chesapeake Group's efforts. " Continue reading

Continue Reading →

Archives

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM