Home » Articles posted by James A Jacobs (Page 323)
Author Archives: James A Jacobs
The Wrath of the Library of Congress
When WashingtonWatch.com issued a press release that said "WashingtonWatch.com provides a more user-friendly and interactive way for the public to learn about legislation than the Library of Congress' THOMAS site. It's all about government transparency" he got an email from the Library of Congress asking him to stop using the Library's name in his marketing materials.
- Washington Watch goes wiki, incurs wrath of Library of Congress, by Nate Anderson, ars technica, May 07, 2007.
Microsoft vs. Open Formats
Open file formats are essential for government information because they provide a better opportunity for open exchange, reuse, and preservation of public information. As was reported a couple of weeks ago (see Open Formats Legislation Killed in Florida), Microsoft opposed a piece of Florida legislation that would have required the state to develop "a plan and a business case" for using open file formats in documents the state creates. This story has not been widely covered (I still have not found anything in LexisNexis), but the Wall Street Journal now confirms the story.
- State Open-Source Bills Get Microsoft's Attention, by John Letzing, Wall Street Journal, May 2, 2007; Page B2F
...within an hour of the proposed bill's reading in late March, Dr. Homan said, he was greeted in his office by three lobbyists representing Microsoft Corp. "They were here lickety-split," he said. "I had no idea it was going to get that kind of reaction."
The WSJ reports that the Florida instance was not unique, saying that Microsoft has mounted a lobbying effort against ODF, the OpenDocument Format, which was ratified by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Texas faced a similar lobbying effort from Microsoft:
Soon after introducing an open-document format bill in the Texas state legislature in February, Rep. Marc Veasey said it was clear Microsoft was going to commit considerable time and effort to influencing the outcome. "Immediately we heard from Microsoft and their lobbyist here in Austin, and we knew we'd be up against a tough battle."
ODF is important to government information because, as the WSJ says, "Document formats serve as an underlying digital container, controlling access to files like spreadsheets and the ability to share them." [emphasis added] And:
The impetus for the Texas bill was similar to that in other states -- a desire to ensure access to archived and current documents regardless of which company's application is used to open them, and lower costs. [emphasis added]
It is not just about saving money or lowering costs or short-term financial savings. It is about long-term preservation of knowledge and access to public information.
InfoWord also covers the story:
- Microsoft's state-by-state fight to maintain its Office monopoly (WSJ), by Matt Asay, InfoWorld, May 02, 2007.
It would be one thing if Microsoft were fighting efforts to put open source/open standards on a superior footing. But it's trying to keep ODF from even receiving equal treatment. Dr. Horman (the Florida legislator) is right when he suggests:Microsoft sees what's coming. Things like Word and Excel are sort of like a drug now getting ready to go generic.With 97% market share in the office productivity suite market, it's understandable that Microsoft would feel threatened. Understandable, but not laudable.
That drug analogy is particularly appropriate, not hyperbole, when one sees this tactic that Microsoft is using as reported in the WSJ article:
Earlier this month, the company said it will offer a $3 software suite to students in developing countries, which will help position Microsoft against cheaper open-source products available there. [emphasis added]
Three Dollars! The analogy doesn't go far enough. This is less like prescription pharmaceuticals under patent and more like street drugs with the pusher giving the first dose for free.
Continue readingCriticisms of Google Book Search
Recently, there have been a couple of criticisms of Google Book Search that go beyond the knee-jerk arguments we hear from time to time.
In a post on the ACRL blog (Siva Vaidhyanathan Questions Google Book Search, by Marc Meola, ACRLog, April 23rd, 2007), Meola describes a presentation by Siva Vaidhyanathan at the Drexel University Libraries' Scholarly Communication Symposium. Siva asks some pointed questions of Google and its library partners. I was particularly struck by this thought:
At one point, Vaidhyanathan compared Google Book Search to the Human Genome Project. Here, he claimed, a for-profit company named Celera demonstrated it could do the work better and faster, but governments declined, recognizing that this information should not be privatized. Now Vaidhyanathan became animated, stating that it should be the same for knowledge and asking, "since when is expediency one of the core values of librarianship?"
In a post at the AHA blog (Google Books: What's Not to Like?. by Robert Townsend, American Historical Association Blog, April 30, 2007), Townsend notes the problems he found with Google Book search included poor scan quality, faulty metadata, and "truncated public domain."
Over the past three months I spent a fair amount of time on the site as part of a research project on the early history of the profession, and from a researcher's point of view I have to say the results were deeply disconcerting.
For specifics about Google Book Search and government documents, see: Need Full Access to Gov Docs in Google Book Search.
Continue readingNeed Full Access to Gov Docs in Google Book Search
An Open Letter to Google, William Patry, and Google's Library Partners
All I'm asking for is full access for the public to government documents on Google BookSearch. These documents are in the public domain and therefore should not be limited by claims of copyright, by Google or by the Library Partners.Also see: Google Book Search treats government documents as copyrighted material
It looks as if Google is definitely considering all post-1923 works under copyright.Continue reading
DomeNation: TV show about the intersection of technology and politics
Jerome Armstrong of the progressive blog MyDD and conservative Republican David All have launched an Internet-based TV show about the intersection of technology and politics. David says, "We’ll cover the beat from our perspective as admitted-partisan political operatives." You can see it at youtube.com/user/domeNation Watch it now! The first one is only three minutes long. Continue reading
Latest Comments