GPO & Federal Judiciary Announce Pilot Program of Enhanced Public Access To Federal Court Opinions

GPO & Federal Judiciary Enhance Public Access To Federal Court Opinions Government Printing Office, Press Release, May 4, 2011 No. 11-23.

The U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) and the Federal Judiciary are launching a one- year pilot program providing free public access to court opinions through GPO's Federal Digital System (FDsys). The joint project was approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States and GPO's Congressional oversight committee, the Joint Committee on Printing. When fully implemented, the pilot will include up to 42 courts. The Judiciary continually has sought ways to enhance public access to court opinions. Free access to opinions in all Federal courts is currently available via the Judiciary's Public Access to Court Electronic Records service (PACER). Building on that success, staff from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts met with GPO management to explore making opinions available through FDsys, which can provide the public with a robust search engine that can search common threads across opinions and courts. The public will be able to access court opinions in the next several months through GPO's Federal Digital System: www.fdsys.gov

No votes yet

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Format matters for Fed court opinions

Ari Hershowitz at the Tabulaw blog has a good piece entitled "Losing Data in PDF: All the King's Sources" in which he describes clearly and succinctly why format matters. Ari describes in some detail about data loss from publishing court opinions in (untagged) pdf. We wholeheartedly agree that govt information needs to adhere to clear and open standards and be published in a tagged and structured format (like XML).

The solution, technically simple, will take some political will, or some technical enlightenment from the Court: publish Court opinions in an official electronic format that includes important structural information. This could be as simple as publishing the document in a "tagged" pdf format, or even better, to move toward a more "native" electronic format such as XML. The Executive Branch has done with the Federal Register (a report of all official government updates) and the Code of Federal Regulations, which are now both published in XML.

Work toward permanent public access!

[NOTE: Bernadine Abbott Hoduski asked me to post this comment for her]

"It took a lot of years and a lot of determined docs people to get here. Lets work for permanent access to most of the courts info and free access to the public. Bernadine"

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Every instance of "<!--tableofcontents-->" in the input text will be replaced with a collapsible mediawiki-style table of contents. Accepts options for title, list style, minimum heading level, and maximum heading level as follows: <!--tableofcontents list: ol; title: Table of Contents; minlevel: 1; maxlevel: 3;-->. All arguments are optional and defaults are shown.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/3">interwiki</a>.

More information about formatting options

Syndicate content