Home » Commentary » PACER Removes Court Case Documents
Our mission
Free Government Information (FGI) is a place for initiating dialogue and building consensus among the various players (libraries, government agencies, non-profit organizations, researchers, journalists, etc.) who have a stake in the preservation of and perpetual free access to government information. FGI promotes free government information through collaboration, education, advocacy and research.
← Why GPO’s proposed policy to allow Regionals to discard is a bad idea Docs Confirm NSA sharing data with 23 U.S. government agencies, via ICREACH search engine →
Latest Posts
- PEGI Project Urges Preservation of Public Federal Data
- Public letter re the firing of the Archivist of the United States
- Call to arms: What government information librarians can do to help save critical federal information from being lost
- The government information crisis is bigger than you think it is
- Federal information scrubbing has begun. Please support the End of Term Archive and Environmental Data Governance Initiative (EDGI)
Latest Comments
- Aimee Quinn on The government information crisis is bigger than you think it is
- James R. Jacobs on Federal information scrubbing has begun. Please support the End of Term Archive and Environmental Data Governance Initiative (EDGI)
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- Kathleen Cunningham on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- Gretchen Gehrke on EDGI’s new public comments initiative
- James R. Jacobs on Reference question and the saga of chasing down a Congressionally mandated report
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- Cass Hartnett on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- James R. Jacobs on Beautiful video on the history of fire lookouts – and fire! – highlights lots of US govt publications and records
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
Blogroll
- ASU Gov Docs
- beSpacific
- Best. Titles. Ever. (Tumblr)
- Center for Effective Government
- Every CRS Report New Reports RSS Feed
- FDLP Desktop
- FDLP News & Events
- FullTextReports
- GISIG UW-SLIS: Gov Info, Sources, Data & Docs
- Government Book Talk
- Government Information Network (Canada)
- Government Information News from Fondren Library, Rice University
- GPO [twitter]
- INFOdocket
- Information Observatory
- Libraries+ Network
- Library Babel Fish by Barbara Fister
- NARA records express
- Open The Government
- Secrecy News
- SLA GovInfo [twitter]
- StatFountain
- Sunlight Foundation
- University of Washington Gov Pubs Finds
PACER Removes Court Case Documents
On August 10, 2014, The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, which runs PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) abruptly announced that a bunch of cases would “no longer be available.” See below for a copy of the announcement and the cases covered.
PACER makes court papers available (for a fee) as well as court opinions (for free). It is not clear from the announcement, but it appears that the removal of these cases will include the removal of the opinions.
Some court opinons are available through CourtWeb (the “Online Federal Court Opinions Information System”) which “provides information on selected recent opinions of those judges of the United States Courts who elect to make information available on this site,” and from the websites of the individual courts.
As a joint “project” of the Government Printing Office and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, FDsys has some United States Courts Opinions, but (apparently) none of the opinions in the list of withdrawn cases and none of the case files that PACER has. PACER includes: a Case Locator service (a national index for U.S. district, bankruptcy, and appellate courts), listings of all parties and participants including judges, attorneys and trustees, compilations of case related information such as cause of action, nature of suit and dollar demand, chronologies of dates of case events entered in the case record, A claims registry, A listing of new cases each day in all courts, Judgments or case status. (In the table below I have included the coverage of case opinions by FDsys.)
There have been attempts, including by Aaron Schwart, to free this information from the fee system (RECAP, Public.Resource.Org), but they have had limited success and have been met with vehement opposition (FBI Investigated Coder for Liberating Paywalled Court Records and Court Tells Users They Can’t Use RECAP).
Although PACER makes court opinions available for free, it is one of the agencies that is required (like NTIS) to recover costs. In 1988, the Judiciary sought appropriations from the U.S. Congress in order to provide electronic public access to court records but Congress did not provide the funds and instead directed the Judiciary to fund the initiative through user fees. As a result, the program relies exclusively on fee revenue (PACER FAQ). It has an elaborate free schedule for searching and obtaining court papers (Electronic Public Access Fee Schedule). The fees that PACER charges have been shown to far exceed its costs (PACER Federal Court Record Fees Exceed System Costs).
Most agencies are permitted by statute to charge fees for access to information. Even GPO is allowed to “charge reasonable fees” (44 USC sec 4102) to the public. (Although it is required to make its systems available to depository libraries without charge, we all know how well trying to charge the public for information available free at libraries worked out for GPO when it tried to charge for GPO Access back in the 1990s: Privatization of GPO, Defunding of FDsys, and the Future of the FDLP.) Still, the threat always remains that Congress will privatize or commercialize or monetize its information “assets” at any time. As long as we rely on GPO and government agencies to preserve and provide free access to government information, we are playing a risky game (When we depend on pointing instead of collecting). If we lose that game, it is our users who will pay the price (and the cost) and they will not thank us for failing to preserve government information and ensure free access to it.
The Annoucement:
Please contact the court directly to obtain copies of documents and dockets in the above cases. Contact information for each court is available on the Court Locator page.
Press coverage:
Related
Tags: fee-based services, free vs. fee, less_access, pacer