Home » Commentary » Is PACER a portent of things to come?
Our mission
Free Government Information (FGI) is a place for initiating dialogue and building consensus among the various players (libraries, government agencies, non-profit organizations, researchers, journalists, etc.) who have a stake in the preservation of and perpetual free access to government information. FGI promotes free government information through collaboration, education, advocacy and research.
← Leaked EPA document shows it knowingly approved pesticide toxic to honeybees GAO reports on NARA Electronic Records Archive →
Latest Posts
- Reference question and the saga of chasing down a Congressionally mandated report
- PEGI charts a FAIR direction for the US government information ecosystem
- Supreme Court ethics with John Oliver
- Happy 16th Birthday to the LOCKSS-USDOCS network!
- National Archives to Host Sunshine Week Panel on Artificial Intelligence and Government Access
Latest Comments
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- Cass Hartnett on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- James R. Jacobs on Beautiful video on the history of fire lookouts – and fire! – highlights lots of US govt publications and records
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- Jeremy Darrington on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- James R. Jacobs on Down a few rabbit holes in search for a historic pamphlet on Fascism
- James R. Jacobs on Happy 2023! The state of government information in 2023
- Bernadine Abbott Hoduski on FGI’s recommendations for creating the “all-digital FDLP”
- James R. Jacobs on FGI’s recommendations for creating the “all-digital FDLP”
- Andy Sherman on FGI’s recommendations for creating the “all-digital FDLP”
Blogroll
- ASU Gov Docs
- beSpacific
- Best. Titles. Ever. (Tumblr)
- Center for Effective Government
- Every CRS Report New Reports RSS Feed
- FDLP Desktop
- FDLP News & Events
- FullTextReports
- GISIG UW-SLIS: Gov Info, Sources, Data & Docs
- Government Book Talk
- Government Information Network (Canada)
- Government Information News from Fondren Library, Rice University
- GPO [twitter]
- INFOdocket
- Information Observatory
- Libraries+ Network
- Library Babel Fish by Barbara Fister
- NARA records express
- Open The Government
- Secrecy News
- SLA GovInfo [twitter]
- StatFountain
- Sunlight Foundation
- University of Washington Gov Pubs Finds
Is PACER a portent of things to come?
Steve Schultze, who is Associate Director of The Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton, gives an excellent history and background to the fee-based PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) system and various attempts to make this public information freely available.
A lot of this information will be old news if you’ve been following the story over the years, but I’ve never seen it all brought together so thoroughly in one place with so many good links before. Schultze summarizes the problem:
The sad irony of the PACER fiasco is seeing government officials get upset when their system was being used during a free trial. (They complained because “One request was being made every three seconds”!) They shut down the free-access trial to put a stop to that! And they initiated an FBI investigation of those who were using the system so heavily! In a different world, a government agency would be proud to see its information being heavily used and valued by the public; governments would develop policies, missions, and budgets to encourage this.
But PACER generates money through its fees and, in a world in which “cost recovery” and “self sustaining programs” and “pay as you go” and restrictions on access are valued more than free public access, free use is anathema.
There is a lesson for all of us here. Budgets are bad and governments are cutting back drastically. We are sure to see rollbacks in free access; restrictions put on access or reuse or both; fees imposed; information taken offline because it is “too expensive” to keep online. Some agencies will fight these restrictions, but will be hard-put to find the resources and support to win those battles. Those agencies will need our help. Other agencies will welcome the excuse to have stricter control over what they reveal and what they hide; they will welcome the opportunity to raise money on their information “assets.” We will have to fight those agencies.
In general, the economic situation in the nation means that we are going to have to fight to maintain free public access to government information. Free access to information on the web will not be a given at a time when governments are slashing budgets and politicians are campaigning to reduce government services and outsource those services to the private (fee-based) sector.
We can certainly fight politically by lobbying and supporting causes we believe in. But we also can fight using our own resources and making our own choices. One way we can do that is to get that information off of government-controlled servers and into the hands of our community libraries where our communities are in control of access. This goes against the now common idea that “everything is on the web” so we don’t have to have local collections any more. On the contrary, this is the very time that we need to build digital collections to ensure long term preservation of that information and long-term free public access to it. “Self sustaining” government agencies are the enemy of free public access. We have a lot of flexibility in the digital age; “communities” no longer have to be geographically-based. Every library can have communities-of-interest and users anywhere.
Libraries that are confused about their role should see this as a clear, unambiguous opportunity. Rather than shirking the responsibility of building collections and hoping that someone else will keep information freely available, libraries can seize the opportunity to do what no one else is doing: build free digital public libraries. Providing actual collections (rather than links to content that may or may not be there tomorrow) will engender support (and funding) better than vague promises of user-assistance. Providing actual services built on top of those locally-controlled collections will attract users at a time when users are ignoring services-without-collections-libraries in favor of google.
The easiest place to start building digital collections is with public domain government information. (Is any library downloading all the documents at fcic.gov? Someone should — before it is too late!)
Related
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Tags: pacer