Hot off the presses: “Bernadine’s Office Building: Working in the capitol and other dangerous places”
Have you ever wondered what it’s like to work on Capitol Hill as a Congressional staffer? Well, wonder no more. Bernadine Abbott Hoduski, library star, mother of government documents in libraries, and tireless advocate for libraries, has just published her memoir “Bernadine’s Office Building: Working in the capitol and other dangerous places.” It’s sure to be a page turner, so pick one up for yourself and one for your library while you’re at it!
Bernadine Abbott Hoduski was a long-time government documents librarian in both academic and governmental libraries, including twenty years as a professional staff member of the Congressional Joint Committee on Printing (JCP) in Washington, D.C., where she also taught government documents at Catholic University. She was the co-editor of Documents to the People, federal documents editor for the Government Publications Review, and wrote a column for The Unabashed Librarian. She is the author of Lobbying for Libraries and the Public’s Access to Government Information: An Insider’s View (Scarecrow Press, 2003), and chaired both the ALA Committee on Legislation and the GODORT Legislation Committee. She is now retired and lives in Missouri.
FGI public testimony before Congress advocates for GPO gift authority
Here’s something fun I did this week. For their public witness day, I submitted testimony before the House appropriations subcommittee on the legislative branch for their FY2026 budget. :slightly_smiling_face: Many thanks to Daniel Schuman of the American Governance Institute and founder and an editor of the First Branch Forecast (you’re all subscribed to FBF right?!). Daniel was so well organized, got a whole host of folks to submit testimony to the subcommittee, and helpfully walked me through the entire process! Let’s hope at least some of the recommendations make it through the appropriations process. I was a little surprised that I didn’t see any representatives from any of the major library associations there, especially given that this subcommittee deals with funding for the Government Publishing Office (GPO) and Library of Congress among other aspects of the legislative branch — though this is of course NOT a regular year (understatement of the decade!) in the normally regular appropriations process.
Testimony Before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch, FY 2026, Concerning Gift Authority for the Government Publishing Office, submitted by James R. Jacobs, US Government Information Librarian, Stanford University.
Testimony Before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch, FY 2026, Concerning Gift Authority for the Government Publishing Office, submitted by James R. Jacobs, US Government Information Librarian, Stanford University
Dear Chair Valadao, Ranking Member Espaillat, and distinguished members of the Subcommittee:
Thank you for the opportunity to address you and this committee today regarding a matter concerning the efficiency, modernization, and public service mission of the Government Publishing Office (GPO). My testimony advocates for a statutory change granting GPO the explicit authority to accept gifts, bequests, and devices of both monetary and nonmonetary property and distribute grants to libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP).
I am the US government information librarian at Stanford University and my library’s Federal Depository Library Program coordinator. Stanford has been an FDLP member since 1895. As such, my everyday work is to build historic collections and offer research services to students, faculty, staff and the general public in Santa Clara County and increasingly across the country.
The authority of government agencies to accept gifts and distribute grants is generally restricted without specific statutory authorization. As the Government Accountability Office has noted, “without statutory authority, an individual government agency may not accept gifts of goods or services for its own use”. However, other legislative branch entities, such as the Library of Congress, and other federal entities with missions concerning access to information, like the Smithsonian Institution and the National Archives and Records Administration, possess such authority. We recommend gift authority be extended to the GPO.
Providing gift authority to the GPO would yield several significant benefits:
1. Saving Taxpayer Money: Acceptance of gifts, bequests, and devises can provide GPO with resources beyond its appropriated budget. This could allow GPO to undertake valuable projects in collaboration with FDLP libraries and other organizations, invest in modernization efforts, and enhance its services without requiring additional taxpayer funds. For example, donations could support the digitization and description of historical documents in the “National Collection,” the development of new tools for public access, and the preservation of tangible collections.
2. Economy of Services: Nonmonetary gifts, such as in-kind services, equipment, or collections of historical materials, could significantly enhance GPO’s operational capacity and resources. Accepting voluntary and uncompensated personal services, for example, could allow for the accession of digitized documents from FDLP libraries or assistance with adding metadata. Granting authority would be a virtuous loop to help to fund preservation and digitization projects in FDLP libraries which would then feed back into GPO’s systems for the betterment of all American citizens. This could speed up the process by which materials are made publicly available and decrease the cost for doing so.
3. Improving Public Access to Information: Enhanced resources through gift acceptance can directly translate to improved public access to government information. Donations and grants could fund initiatives to improve the online repository govinfo.gov, enhance cataloging and indexing services, or support Federal Depository Libraries in their mission to provide no-fee access to government information.
This is an issue that has been previously contemplated by Congress. Draft legislation released by Congress for public comment contained a provision regarding gift authority in section 563. It stated clearly:
The Public Printer may accept and use gifts and bequests of property (both real and personal) and services in support of the Superintendent’s responsibilities under this chapter.
Section 109 of that bill provided for congressional oversight of the gifts and disclosure of gifts in semi-annual reports. This seems an appropriate framework.
There are few circumstances where Congress can have its cake and eat it too. Extending to GPO the authority to receive gifts and distribute grants could provide enormous benefits to the American people in terms of access to records and do so at no cost to taxpayers. We respectfully request that you provide to GPO the same gift authority that is already available to other agencies who provide the public with access to government records. My recommendation would positively impact the work of the GPO, the 1100+ FDLP libraries and every citizen in every Congressional district.
I welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you further.
Thank you for your interest and attention.
Vicky Reich and David Rosenthal receive CNI Paul Evans Peters Award for LOCKSS
Congratulations to Vicky and David, founders of LOCKSS for receiving the Paul Evans Peters Award! this is a HUGE and justified honor for their lifetimes’ impactful work in libraries and digital preservation. They join other luminaries who have received the Peters Award, among them Tim Berners Lee, Vint Serf, Brewster Kahle, Paul Ginsparg, Daniel Atkins, Christine Borgman, Donald Lindberg, Herbert Van de Sompel, Francine Berman, Paul Courant, and Tony Hey. A veritable who’s who of the internet and libraries!
The Paul Evans Peters Award is a lifetime achievement award that “recognizes the most notable and lasting international achievements related to information technology and the creation and use of information resources and services that advance scholarship and intellectual productivity.” It is jointly awarded by the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI), Association of Research Libraries (ARL), and EDUCAUSE.
David and Vicky put up the lecture entitled “Lessons from LOCKSS” that they gave in receiving the Peters Award. It’s a fascinating look at their social AND technical work in developing LOCKSS and the history of digital preservation in libraries. I especially appreciate Vicky’s discussion about the importance of preservation of government information and the spectrum of efforts that have gone into their preservation — including LOCKSS USDOCS, End of Term Archive (EOT), and the Data Rescue Project — and how the concept of the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) and its tamper-resistant and long impact on preservation of the information of our democracy is actually embedded in LOCKSS.
NASA Deletes Comic Book About How Women Can Be Astronauts
Things have gotten really weird when comic books are verboten in this Orwellian present. NASA has deleted two comic books about women astronauts from all its websites, according to NASA Watch, the latest victim of the Trump’s administration’s purge of “DEI” content from federal agencies. This is apparently due to a directive sent out just days after Trump’s inauguration, as NASA personnel were commanded to excise all mentions of anything “specifically targeting” women on the space agency’s public websites according to 404 Media.
NASA Deletes Comic Book About How Women Can Be Astronauts
Frank Landymore (Mar 25, 2025)
Additionally, NASA’s upcoming Artemis missions had been set to see the first female astronaut set foot on the lunar surface. Oh, except that promise has been dropped, too.
The two volumes have been featured on NASA’s website since being issued in 2021 and 2023, respectively. But as of March 2025, both have now been conspicuously wiped from the space agency’s online presence.
But luckily, they’ve been posted on wikipedia AND preserved in the Internet Archive!
First Woman: NASA’s promise for humanity
Pentagon Culls Social Science Research, deletes 91 funded projects
Today the Pentagon announced that “The Office of the Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (OUSD(R&E)) is scrapping its social science research portfolio as part of a broader effort to ensure fiscal responsibility and prioritize mission-critical activities.”
Examples of cancelled research include:
- The Climate-Food-Urbanization Nexus and the Precursors of Instability in Africa
- Social and Institutional Determinants of Vulnerability and Resilience to Climate Hazards in the African Sahel
- Anticipating Costal Population Mobility: Path to Maladaptation or Sociopolitical Stability
- Comparing Underlying Drivers of South-North Migration in Central America and West Africa
- Democracy Quest (couldn’t find this project in minerva)
- The Language of Parasocial Influence and the Emergence of Extremism
- Weaponized Conspiracies
- Beyond the Clock: Understanding Cross-Cultural Temporal Orientation of Military Officers
- Food Fights: War Narratives and Identity Reproduction in Evolving Conflicts
- Future Fish Wars: Chasing Ocean Ecosystem Wealth
Luckily the End of Term Archive and the Wayback Machine have snapshots of the “Minerva Research Initiative”. Maybe it’s just me, but I would think that funding social science research on global migration patterns, climate change impacts, and social trends is extremely important for long-term planning for the “future battlefield.”
Latest Comments