GAO reports on NARA Electronic Records Archive
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has a new report on the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) development of an Electronic Records Archive (ERA) to preserve and provide access to massive volumes and all types of electronic records.
- Electronic Records Archive: National Archives Needs to Strengthen Its Capacity to Use Earned Value Techniques to Manage and Oversee Development GAO-11-86 January 13, 2011.
GAO recommends, among other things, that NARA establish a comprehensive plan for all remaining work; improve the accuracy of earned value performance reports; and engage executive leadership in correcting negative trends. NARA generally concurred with GAO's recommendations.
- Costs soaring for Archives' digital library, auditors say, by Lisa Rein, Washington Post (February 4, 2011)
The cost of building a digital system to gather, preserve and give the public access to the records of the federal government has ballooned as high as $1.4 billion, and the project could go as much as 41 percent over budget...
The Government Accountability Office blames the cost overruns and schedule delays on weak oversight and planning by the National Archives which awarded a $317 million contract to Lockheed Martin Corp. six years ago to create a modern archive for electronic records....













more links on NARA archive cost overruns
ResourceShelf has links to a few other news items and GAO reports for more context. I'd say 41% over budget is pretty ugly. But I'm surprised to find that the GAO assessment includes no mention of Lockheed Martin's role in the cost overruns. Wonder if anyone has done an analysis of NARA's ERA development and GPO's FDsys in-house development. AFAIK, FDsys development has missed some deadlines and had to revise their development schedule, but have not had these kinds of cost overruns. Anyone have more information on that?
Post new comment